Statement Regarding the Torbay Motor

[hartiberlin]

He is probably powering it from the small generator/motor that is ontop
the plexiglas gear.
If this is a motor that is spinning real quickly and supplied
via wires from hidden batteries inside the footer case, then
it is sure, that the rotor will be stopped immediately, when the
one stator is pulled out and then switches secretly a switch
in the footer case and the small motor is thus stopping,
as geared down this will immediately also stop the wooden rotor.

So the starting and stopping is fast as it is fastened up by the gear ratio.

[NerzhDishual]

Hi clever guys:

Ommibus, hariberlin, acp, spadestick, 2tiger.
I do agree with you. I also smell a rat.

My (simple ?) question is :
Why is this guy (W.D.Torbay) spending so much energy/money/reputation/time... with faked videos/annoncements/claims/patent/web Site... ?

This unanswered question is also relevant for most of the Free NRG controversial devices (Perendev, MEG, and so on).

Any advices?

Best

[mark australia]

I am not sure what motivates these people you mentioned. However its a simple matter to silence the sceptics by having a device tested independently. None of these people have. I dont believe they are dishonest in most cases but self deluded in that they only see what they want to see.
i am not sure if that answered your question which is why would they bother. maybe its the 10 minutes of fame thing.
Mark

[NerzhDishual]

Hi Mark from Australia!

Thank you for responding.

I also whish I could shut up (silence )) any sceptics.
I have not (yet) found/built any device doing it.
But I'm absolutely not giving up.

Most of people are honest.
Most of people are logical.
Most of  people are peaceful.
Are not they?

Self delusion and/or "few time of fame" could be an explanation.
But I'm not completely convinced.

Best

[Liberty]

Skeptics can be a healthy thing for a device that really works.  When it is proven, then the skeptics have egg on their face.  Or if the device is really a fake, then the skeptics have played their part to help self police the industry.  Either way, the skeptics have their place. 

As far as the device described at my web site goes, when I bring it to the level of development and performance that I am looking for, and have tested it myself and am satisfied, then I will not mind an independent test.  Because if I stick a device out there that I don't know will perform, and then if it fails, it would reflect badly on me.  So it is necessary to bring a well tested device (so I really know what the device can do, before I show it), so that the skeptic can have confidence in the device as well and I will know that it will hold up to scrutiny. 

Perhaps it would have been better for the inventor in New York, to bring a known working device and test it before the big show to avoid the skeptics wrath???