Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[skywalker66]

hi everyone
check out this circuit and see the video link
maybe this could be the last thing we can try to get free energy.
the video does not belong to me.
But i have made circuit based on the video ,i would like some one to try this circuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K3HrhH5Qrs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUF7eJAOjF4

After I eye ball several time at these videos I draw my own schematic. See attachment.
Look very smart design in simplification and efficiency assuming is not a hoax.

[skywalker66]

I could say, "Why didn't someone just tell me this to start with?"

To be completely honest, I think each one of us has to play detective and follow the evidence wherever it leads.  Some may get their answer sooner than others.


Where things become blurry to me is considering a single component that offers three pieces of functionality:
  1.  It is an inductor.
  2.  It is capacitor.
  3.  It is a mixing component that has a definite output mechanism.

The third part is where things get tricky.  The mixing must happen via superposition only.  It cannot interfere with parts one and two--these must behave as though their counterpart does not exist.  So one might be inclined to base their design on using part one (inductor) and just providing a secondary making this component a transformer.  The question is, where then are the two capacitor plates?  And do they interfere with the inductor?

If we assume superposition is the principal mechanism allowing this device to operate as intended, can each tank circuit be adequately tuned and synchronized?  Is it necessary for the frequencies of each tank circuit to run at some harmonic or can the base frequency of each be perfectly matched?  The latter method seems to me to be most optimal unless there are physical constraints in doing so.  These constraints may include:
  a.  too small of capacitance for part two
  b.  Q factor too flat for optimal resonance
  c.  phase shift uncontrollable or non-deterministic


Bottom line is to have a procedure in-place that will allow for adjustments until the principal is obtained, goal met; then check validity of this principal as a key basis for operation.  A lot of work to do for sure.  We have examples to work from, but if we understand what it is we are really trying to do, it's possible "the effect" will begin to manifest for many of us; then we will know we are on the right track.

Now you overcomplicate thinks. Let's keep it simply.
Here is what look for me as MO:
1. Grenade is part of transformer - secondary, primary is "inductor"
2. Grenade is part of HV capacitor, other part is HV antenna.
3. Grenade have a path to ground.
4. HV antenna apply unipolar positive HV pulse at the apex of magnetic flux in inductor (or current is the same - on pozitive or negative apex thru trial).
5. When positive pulse is applied two things happen:
    - magnetic flux is compresed further
    - a bunch of electrons are attracted thru electrostatic induction in grenade's circuit .
Remember such a HV pulse for a very short time (ns) is in KW or tens KW power range, so lots of lots
of electrons get captured in magnetic flux inside grenade. 

[AlienGrey]

Look the guy is using an Auto Battery for a start and a big one at that!  If you convert DC to a square wave or a sine wave only the vertical pulse with respect zero is of any use, but it needs to be AC. each time you magnify the pulse in time and speed you end up with a dead zone, that wasted energy needs relocating, like push pull.

If one uses a flywheel in mechanics, it's dead simple with cogs to amplify the speed and then use an efficient generator and prime mover device.

On the other hand if the guy with the 'device' sells you knowledge how he has made his device, THEN THE SECRET is OVER! as once you sell someone a copy your device stuffed, if that's your idea, better to make them at low price and try to maintain the before the Pharisees come round and confiscate the thing and cause you untold misery !

[Jeg]

You really should read this article before you start.

There is a special section 12.10.1 there about sending signals down coaxial cables, but I recommend reading the other sections, too.

Whatever you do, your first order of the day should be modifying the circuit layout and its cabling to stop these spikes from appearing at your gates.

Thanks Verpies. Nice pdf

I made my cables shorter, i added a coax cable for gate signals and things became better. At the end i also connected my dissipative snubbers working in parallel with the lossless clamp. The main kickback power returns back to the pwr sup. and the rest parasitics which remain at the drains, are absorbed by the snubber. First image with the messy layout. Second, when cables went shorter and coax is delivering the gate pulses. Third, with snubbers in place.

[AlienGrey]

If your getting so much trouble with your square wave drive from your 494 output, try putting a ferrite toroid round he gate of your  IGBT ! not using IGBT but FET, I think at 15khz I would be using 1200 Volt IGBTs myself HF ones would have much better switching characteristics and losses, but don't let me influence any of you!