Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

I would very much like to reach a consensus. And, yes, everything seen and unseen is created from the presently undetectable Aether. 

Units of Aether?  Good question, if we could only see them, or measure them. But, we are not there yet.

But we are!  We can already measure many things and if everything is made out of Aether, then we are already measuring it.
Taken this way, the Aether is hiding in a plain sight.
Also, we do not need to see in order to measure, e.g. charge, gravity, magnetics...

What are the units composed of in the common wind?

That would be kg/sec or meter/sec if the air density is constant.

what are the units making the wind force? Or driving the wind.

That would be thermal energy measured in Joules or sec/meter in ST units.

What are the units of power in a vortex called.

Power is always Joules per second ...or 1/meter in ST units.

I can answer that, but for now,  What is vortexial motion called??? 

Its most important attribute is that it is a motion at all.  Motion is measured as meter/sec or m²/sec or m³/sec ....and its inverses.
Rotation is constant change of direction of a motion having constant magnitude.

The next question you must ask yourself is whether it is a motion of something (e.g. something massive) ...or whether it is possible to have motion without that "something" in the equation at all.

[verpies]

I mean not for Teslacoil. But for 15 kiloherc.

For 15kHz and High Voltage (>1kV), the IGBT will always be more efficient.

[NickZ]

  Verpies:
  "The next question you must ask yourself is whether it is a motion of something (e.g. something massive) ...or whether it is possible to have motion without that "something" in the equation at all."

   Not sure what you mean there. But, as I see it there is a CAUSE to all the measure able effects that you've mentioned.
My question relates to the cause of causes. The cause of motion, the cause of wind, the unseen cause of energy.
   Not even a rock can move by it own power, much less worlds. The cause...

   Please refer to Tesla for the best way to describe and explain some of those same questions, that you've answered in the current scientific way.  As you wouldn't believe it if I told you.  And this discussion would go on and on. And I don't want to bore.
   
   And,  No, I'm not talking about God, at this time. But, about the unseen energy that we are trying to tap, and how to achieve that goal. Using cosmic currents, and what it has to do with our energy conversion circuits and devices, such as what we are trying to replicate here.   

[Void]

Void,
Yes about radiant energy.
That is Ambient Backround Energy which is everywhere on earth and in space.
Don Smith talks about this too. Tesla knew and talked about this Cosmic energy,
we  call it static electricity right? when exited for sure
Our Sun is of great responsibility of this source as other suns in space which are continuous.
Tesla coil infact excites it and pulls it towards the coil making the coil and topload work as a collector. open end cap.
be reminded by lightning, that is also radiant  ...between Earth and Ionosphere.
An example of a Spark Gap, Which creates shock waves and collapsing field will attract right?
ever felt a lightning strike close to you? You feel the static all around in your body and hairs.
I have an experiment on my channel using Flyback and sparkgap and could see how it behaves .

Hi GeoFusion. No, Tesla did not talk about static electricity as being radiant energy that I know of.
As I mentioned previously, Tesla gave examples of radiant energy in his patent application as
certain types of radiations from the sun, x-rays, and ultraviolet light. When you talk about a tesla
coil pulling in 'ambient background energy', that is not static electricity, and without a clear definition of
what is meant by 'ambient background energy' you can't determine if that is the same as what Tesla was referring
to as radiant energy. I believe Don Smith was actually referring to something different than Tesla's 'radiant energy'
when Don Smith referred to 'ambient background energy'. There could be some relation however. You would
need a clear definition from Don Smith about how he was using that term. I recall Don Smith was talking about
pulling in 'free electrons' from the ambient and also talking about separating electron pairs and that sort of
thing. For that reason, I think Don Smith was talking about something different than what Tesla was talking about
in Tesla's 'Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy' patent. Anyway, no worries. Was just curious what you
meant by radiant energy since what you showed in your video seems to be unrelated to what Tesla was referring
to as radiant energy.

[NickZ]

  Void and All:
  Perhaps this link will help to clarify some aspect of the Aether, non-inductive DC impulse technology, and it's relation Tesla's work.
  If you like to hear about it first hand, as personally written by Tesla, I'm sure that you can find it, IF interested.
 
   I feel that both Nelson, GeoFusion, as well as myself are talking the talk and walking the walk. Only time will tell... if right, or not.  But, I wish to have the same excitement as what Nelson must of felt, when he pulled the plug, and the thing kept going.
If you know what I mean...

   After reading some of these ideas, below,  we'll either be on the SAME page.  Or,  we won't.
And, as it's probably something that even Verpies has heard about, 
  So, why only the closed minded and materially oriented concepts and principles,  accepted?

   
   http://johnbedini.net/john34/Radiant1.htm