Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

   T-1000:
   Ok, well thanks for your explanation of Nelson's idea about charging the capacitor, while connecting the negative side to the earth ground. However, I still don't get it. As Hoppy mentioned earlier, I also see nothing special about that. 
   
   AG was relaying something about 0 draw, by returning the unused part of the reactive kick back to the source.  Which is not what Nelson is showing in the video. So, I'm still confused as to what he is really trying to show.
   I can also do the same thing, yet that is not free energy, but still using a power source to charge the cap in the first place, which is connected to an earth ground, instead of the grid's ground. Nothing is being returned to the input source, and the draw from the input source is not changed, just because of the capacitor grounding to the earth, instead.  Or not?
  So, please clarify that further if possible. As Nelson's video is not explaining anything about what he is trying to show. And I'd like to understand it, if it's really something of value.
 

   AG's question remains unanswered.
   reactive "punch" == Reactive Power (Q), (ie; represents the 'unused' energy alternately stored and released by inductors and/or capacitors in an AC circuit).

Is this statement correct in relation to your concept of reactive "punch"?

So, In other words,
1- Hit one side of the grounded capacitor with a spike of Reactive Power (Q).
2- and since a reactive circuit returns as much power to the supply as it consumes, (because the same amount of energy is recycled alternately from source to the load and from load to source).
3- the resulting average power consumed by the circuit is zero.
4- meanwhile (back at the ranch) the capacitor is being filled by *ambient* electrons.

   I'm also curious as the unipolar DC output from a Tesla coil, or Kacher circuit. As that is what Tesla mentioned suggesting that only this unipolar type of DC (plasma jet like one way un-interupted pulses should be used), and not an AC pulse, as the interupter pulser's output.   So, how do we make these types of unipolar pulse using a Kacher circuit?
   

[scratchrobot]

Hi all,

Can you please guys move all offtopic back to http://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/ thread? This thread is not waste bin where you can dump everything and it is getting harder to follow on what is being posted in relation to replications and experiments.

Yes this topic is about Kapanadze's Cousin not Kapanadze![/size]
It's already hard enough to follow this 1016 page long thread full of wisdom.[/size]
  [/size]

[AlienGrey]

 
   AG's question remains unanswered.
   reactive "punch" == Reactive Power (Q), (ie; represents the 'unused' energy alternately stored and released by inductors and/or capacitors in an AC circuit).

Is this statement correct in relation to your concept of reactive "punch"?

So, In other words,
1- Hit one side of the grounded capacitor with a spike of Reactive Power (Q).
2- and since a reactive circuit returns as much power to the supply as it consumes, (because the same amount of energy is recycled alternately from source to the load and from load to source).
3- the resulting average power consumed by the circuit is zero.
4- meanwhile (back at the ranch) the capacitor is being filled by *ambient* electrons.

   I'm also curious as the unipolar DC output from a Tesla coil, or Kacher circuit. As that is what Tesla mentioned suggesting that only this unipolar type of DC (plasma jet like one way un-interupted pulses should be used), and not an AC pulse, as the interupter pulser's output.   So, how do we make these types of unipolar pulse using a Kacher circuit?

Nick Re Nelsons statements are simple to  understand unless you do them yourself you won't understand how it works and you will remain confused and miss quoting people, take it easy man! Have a look at some of his other videos they might help.

AG

[NickZ]

    AG:
    You mention:
   "2- and since a reactive circuit returns as much power to the supply as it consumes, (because the same amount of energy is recycled alternately from source to the load and from load to source).
3- the resulting average power consumed by the circuit is zero."

   I have been taking it easy.  I hope that you have been taking it easy, also.

  And as you understand just how to take the output from a "reactive kick" and show how it allows for a 0 input draw, I would be most interested in seeing that done.  If this is a key point, then it should be looked into, it seams to me.  Or am I missing something? Or are Nelson's statements just easy to understand, but not so easy to put into practice.  0 draw???
   If I've been misquoting please straighten me out. I have seen his other videos, which are not showing a self runner, which is really the point of it all, or not?  At least for me it is.  And I have done, and can replicate the effect that he's showing on his videos, except the self running one.   And like the Shadow, he ain't telling...

[PolaczekCebulaczek]

I don't have time for this right now, but can someone of you run tesla coil from collapsing magnetic field only ,back emf, and see what happens?

like this:

also adding grenade to this would be nice.
If grenade coil is what I think it is then this is a good start.