Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[AlienGrey]

   Then if not, why would he mention anything about the 1kW to 5kW? 
   Was he just talking about using a capacitor to dampen a wave?
    A dampened wave by itself will not give you more output, like 5 times more, than the 1kW input used.
   Maybe we'll never know what he really meant. But, of course a capacitor can give you more out than in, for and instant.
But, it's not free energy.

So while your romancing what if. Have you ever come across a Russian Guy called 'Alexander Chovenosky' not sure on spelling he had a device that gave 5 time out than in it just used a spark gap DC he had a basic Jewel thief circuit in the 60s years ago some American ontriponair visited him in Russia and persuaded  him to take the device to America not sure how long he lasted but he soon died suddenly, see if you can find out more about him and his ionizing spark gap it might help.

According to Frolov, the DC ammeter does not measure an increase of current (rather a decrease) when the incandescent light bulb is lit by the current going through the spark gap. This confirms the theory (see at the beginning) that a capacitor can provide additional energy - coming from the Aether - when discharged rapidly. And I think Frolov's explanation (pinch-effect, additional kinetic energy) is therefore inaccurate.

[Jeg]

Hi Void, Nick

Thanks for your opinion on this Void. I tend to agree with Nick, as Tesla mentions the input power. He says that it is of a 1 KW power. Between two systems which both consume 1KW of power. the one with dump wave can produce millions of horse power. He doesn't state any further power consumption..

If we take the assumption one step further, we can say that Ruslan's system without HF oscillations consume for example 1KW and gives at the output in ideal conditions a 1KW of power. But by inserting/superimposing the HF component and making it this way a dump wave, then the output increases in terms of power and the system can sustain its own operation.

[Jeg]

the lesson here is that there is a fundamental difference between the activity and thereby energy content of damped versus undamped waves...

Hi Steve, thanks for the contribution
We know that there is a direct relation between energy and power. So i assume that by increasing energy while operating we can indeed raise the output power. I find it as an almost direct statement of Tesla that this is the way to tap in to this ocean of dielectric energy.

[NickZ]

   It seam so, to me as well.
   But, it was not totally free energy, as it needed the 1kW for it to work as mentioned.  Although not yet self running, but could produce OU, at least. More out than in, as that extra power came from no man made energy source, and was external to the device, the Aether.

   It was after his tower in New York was torn down that he began work on the self powered car, and other free energy projects. And hoped to carry that same mode of operation onto planes, trains, and space ships, also.
   Most of his notes on those subjects were taken after he died, or was killed. And those notes are still secret, today. And that's why we don't know much about his ideas on free energy harvested from the cosmic soup, etz.
   But, that has not stopped the progress made by Kapanadze, Akula, Ruslan, Stalker, Roma, Adrian, and others.

   Thanks for the back up guys, sometimes I feel like no one really believes any of this.
But, I do, even if no one else does.

   Good to see you posting again Jeg.

   There are no solid state free energy devices that can self run, without the use of capacitors, that I know of.
    I found out long ago, that using a joule thief attached to a leden jar capacitor, while using just a 1.5v battery could shock the living shit out of you.

    Then NMR from ferrite, or from copper, came onto our discussions. 
    And now, the tapping of the ions from gases in the air. 
    Both of which I highly doubt.
    Sorry T-1000... but, thanks anyways.

    What I'm really asking for is: What it takes to obtain self running? What to look for, and just how to tune for it? Can't hit the target if you don't know what to aim for.
    I know that there is not one person here that knows those answers. By hands on experiments.
     But, several of us have gotten to the point of giving up, with out that final and possibly secret bit of information.  That still missing link, if there is one.

[Void]

Hi Void, Nick
Thanks for your opinion on this Void. I tend to agree with Nick, as Tesla mentions the input power. He says that it is of a 1 KW power. Between two systems which both consume 1KW of power. the one with dump wave can produce millions of horse power. He doesn't state any further power consumption..

Hi Jeg. I can't follow what you are saying there. The input power was from a generator
so he would have most probably been referring to average input power (for example 1kW), but
that does not mean that he couldn't have been referring to instantaneous power when
referring to power at the output of hundreds of thousands or millions of Watts/HP.

From Tesla's analogy of comparing it to a pile driver, it does appear that Tesla was talking about
instantaneous power. If you think about it, if Tesla was able to increase the average power
from the average input power to the average output power by such a huge factor by simply pulsing
a tesla coil, then that would have been huge news back then, just as it would be now, and many
people who experiment with pulsing tesla coils with spark gaps should have noticed this massive average
power gain by now as well, don't you think?

All the best...