Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Jeg]

Hi Jeg.

The same place I found these for my electrostatic experiments!   

https://youtu.be/-4XlD4YP5Kc

eBay. They're very reasonable in price but the transport packaging leaves a lot to be desired!


https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Stainless-Steel-Mirror-Polished-Sphere-Hollow-Ball-Home-Garden-Ornament-Decor/272805773546?var=571945317642&hash=item3f847dc0ea:m:mWDMcGeolenTT6AQphwas5A

Cheers Graham.

Great idea. Thanks a lot Graham. Should I search them just as metallic spheres?

Ahh now I saw the link. Crazy video by the way. I have seen it again. Great job

[Void]

I thought Tinsel Koala was just joking when he posted his 'EEEE' thing, as it is really
just Tesla's 'system of transmission of electrical energy' wireless power transmission setup. 
I think you will find that there is not much difference between placing the load between
the receiver coil secondary and the earth ground wire and having a secondary step down
winding to connect the load to, but maybe there is some difference in performance.

All the best...

[TinselKoala]

I thought Tinsel Koala was just joking when he posted his 'EEEE' thing, as it is really
just Tesla's 'system of transmission of electrical energy' wireless power transmission setup. 
I think you will find that there is not much difference between placing the load between
the receiver coil secondary and the earth ground wire and having a secondary step down
winding to connect the load to, but maybe there is some difference in performance.

All the best...

Not exactly. One of the critical features of the EEEE apparatus is the _coaxiality_ of the transmitter and primary receiver coil sets. The Tesla patent relies on primarily capacitive coupling, whereas the EEEE uses both capacitive coupling and magnetic coupling to create a zone of highly stressed "space" (vacuum, aether, whatever you like to call it) between the terminal capacitances of the coil sets. If this space is stressed enough, particle pair creation may happen and some of the liberated energy may be entrained into the established power flow between Tx and Rx. Actually this flow goes in both directions, hence the presence of the high voltage FWB in the EEEE concept.
I emphasize again that my layout is simply a conceptual demonstrator and significant results may need much stronger E and M fields than the simple apparatus can produce. 
There are a few other differences also.

[Void]

Not exactly. One of the critical features of the EEEE apparatus is the _coaxiality_ of the transmitter and primary receiver coil sets. The Tesla patent relies on primarily capacitive coupling, whereas the EEEE uses both capacitive coupling and magnetic coupling to create a zone of highly stressed "space" (vacuum, aether, whatever you like to call it) between the terminal capacitances of the coil sets. If this space is stressed enough, particle pair creation may happen and some of the liberated energy may be entrained into the established power flow between Tx and Rx. Actually this flow goes in both directions, hence the presence of the high voltage FWB in the EEEE concept.
I emphasize again that my layout is simply a conceptual demonstrator and significant results may need much stronger E and M fields than the simple apparatus can produce. 
There are a few other differences also.

Hi TK. Ok, however Tesla coils do seem to have very strong magnetic fields around them as well which
depending on the input power level can extend for quite a distance. BTW, for those familiar with Don Smith's
stuff, you may recall that Don Smith also talked about the use of some type of particle pairs as being the source of
excess power in his tesla coil type devices, although no one seems to have been able to duplicate Don Smith's claims 
with any sort of convincing demonstration.

All the best...

[AlienGrey]

Well all this Tesla stuff and everything that's been on this thread how many years has it been going ? 13 or 14 years now, has any one seen a free energy device
any one can replicate that a real FE over unity device ?