Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[bistander]

   SL:   You mentioned: "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron."                                                                                                                                               end quote
   So, SL do you have any proof of the above.
<<<snip>>>>
     BTW: I am very disgusted by what I see still going on at OUR.com.  It's sick, what is allowed to happen with the Troll there....
He was known by a different name here,  F2.... but "he won't post here" now. Guess why...   
   NickZ

Hi NickZ,
You ask for proof. Same as F6. Yet you are disgusted when he does what you have just done.
bi

[maxolous]

Max your circuit with a 74hc132 shmit good idea doing it that way but the feed back needs a 2 trimmers and 2 diodes so it's possible to do a 50% sqr wave other wise its not sqr, some thing lthe gigram bellow.

AG,

Thanks for bringing that up, the output is squarewave. If there is need to add  a cct for varying duty cycle I think I know what to do by adding more  NAND gate cct.

Maxolous

[ramset]

Nick
This is wrong place for this ( not even Stefan's forum)


Please do this in your rant room or ?
And as already mentioned
Defamatory statements are against terms of service ( in all forums actually)


His handle is his call sign and like an international identification!


Zero tolerance here for such liabilities!


And yes I am also concerned with stifling effect on "what if's" at that forum
And I am more concerned he has discouraged Smudge
Will be calling Smudge just to be certain!


That being said I have been taking poll from membership there .
All who actually have builds are more tolerant ( yes it's toooo much attention at times to some
Newer build discussions

                                                                                                                                   
   
   
BTW: Guys, I am very disgusted by what I see still going on at OUR.com.  It's sick, what is allowed to happen with the Troll there. No use posting anything there, as this guy will just regurgitate another one of his paid for replies, about how free energy does not exist, and that never has existed. And how dumb we all are for even trying. Yet he is in a free energy forum to disrupt it, and will never have anything to do with what the forum is about. No matter what proof is shown. HE is no ones friend, nor is he there to help. As his free time is not free, but paid for, and explains how it seams that he has so much free time. Don't be fooled, like the admin there, and Ramset are.  They may disagree with my judgements, but this will continue on for a few more years. Or until his paycheck runs out. I am not the only one that thinks so, several other member there have voiced there complaints, yet nothing is being done about it.  I know what I would do with him... and it would be the 4th or 5t forum he gets banned from for trying to ruin their work and research. I guess that the admin does not care, too busy, or ...   But, I won't post there, nor will a few others.
  He was known by a different name here,  F2.... but "he won't post here" now. Guess why...   
   
   NickZ

Please move this to rant
It does need discussion!
Within terms of service agreement!


Or ?
It's up to you as I am doing the discussion behind the scenes ATM


Respectfully
Chet K
PS
As already mentioned
Our host here has made self moderated sections for builders
Just to eliminate these type liability issues


And as already mentioned
He was ready to close forum over flamewars and also liabilities (His liability as owner)
attached to comments here !
For clarity it was just temporary ( few months)
Until he could sort other upgrades which would allow him easier ability to manage the forum!






Please let's not make that happen here !!
Terms of service are important
And there was already a feature installed to limit this activity ( self moderated builders boards here )

[SolarLab]

   SL:   You mentioned: "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron."                                                                                                                                               end quote
   So, SL do you have any proof of the above. As you know, electrons don't have mass, so not sure about what "electron mass" has to do with free energy. Electrons are not material or physical particles, either. It sounds like it takes the harvesting of "mass", to obtain energy. That is what science thinks, but that is not correct, concerning free energy harvesting. I didn't know that it takes electron mass to obtain free energy. I have learned that it takes energy to have mass. If there is no energy, and no energy fields in space, there would be no material mass, anywhere. As "everything is energy", according to Tesla, as well as his ideas on the Cosmic Soup, and it's source.

   I also have my doubts about the "speed of electrons". Or if there is any thing to "movement" of electrons, at all. How about waves? Do waves actually move from one place A to another place B???  Does light actually move? Such as the speed of light?
What is moving? These are not just details, in my book. And can aid in the understanding of a medium which we can't see.

   
   NickZ

NickZ,
Yes I have proof of the "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the
energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron."

Don't have the time nor the space here to go through the entire physics course, plus it was a long time ago, but this MIT video sums
it all up quite well in less than 38 minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA

Statements like "electrons don't have mass, and so forth" tell me further discussion on the subject would be fruitless. However the
proof is there, and shown experimentally, if one cares to look more closely into it.

Regards,

SL

[NickZ]

  SL:
   Well, I have looked at this closer. But, I am not here to learn that it takes mass to harvest energy from the surrounding space. Like I said not sure that is the solution to free energy.   BTW. Asking for some proof is a bad thing now? I think that the whole point of this thread is all about proof,  replication, and verification. I am not calling any one dumb, for providing what they can provide. Even if it's a video, as that is all we have at this time.
  Ramset: You can move or remove my posts.
I said what I needed to say.

  NickZ