Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  Zeit:
  quote:
  "Did Kapanadze wind Tesla coils when he discovered that OU effect? Or did he rather connect together some three-phase transformers and some three-phase capacitors (like Stepanov)?"

   Tariel had HV going to the antenna coil through the spark-gap, on the very first original device in 1994? Without HV there is no heterodyning of the frequencies. And without that, there is only a oversimplified and very inefficient inverter working, to light the bulbs, with no OU.

  AlienGrey:  All the information that you are looking for has already been given on this thread, but you'll have to look for it.
   Each new device from Ruslan has different circuitry, and components. And unless you're real proficient at electronics, you'll
have a hard time replicating the newest circuits. So, unless you're really committed, (with full conviction), as Hoppy would say,
don't even try it. Or you'll end up like the other guys here, having a poor replication showing no extra output, complaining about
how it must be all faked.
  Below is his latest Kacher oscillator, along with the push-pull circuitry, and winding instructions for the Kacher. 
Sorry for the blurry pic, but I think that you get the idea. Both the Kacher driver, and the push-pull driver are now in one box.
So, as you can see, it's getting very complicated.  You may want to play around with a spark gap (SG) instead.
  Good luck.
   

[Zeitmaschine]

Tariel had HV going to the antenna coil through the spark-gap, on the first original device. Without HV there is no heterodyning of the frequencies. And without that, there is only a oversimplified and very inefficient inverter working, to light the bulbs.

This was proven to be a fake. (One more fake to worry about )

Some HV YES, external (artificial) HV creation and spark gap NO.

Go to 20:20 in this video Kapanadze 28th April 2004 full version free energy device: The spark fails (at least has not its full strength) but the power output stays at 5KW nevertheless.

Conclusion: That spark has nothing to do with the output power of that device. The transformer, the diode bridge, the big silver capacitor, the two transistors on the heat sinks and a small hidden flyback (from B/W TV?) are there to generate that spark just as a mere eye-candy.

Those parts are a poorly (hence failing) constructed push pull flyback driver to add a bit of a nice visual effect for the audience.

Admitted, it took me some time to realize that.

99,99 percent of all demonstrations of OU devices are fakery, either completely or in part (working, but showing misleading components). Now we should look for the 0,01 percent that are real, then we are on the way.

[NickZ]

  Proven to be a fake. By who???
  I haven't seen a "proven fake" yet. But, I have heard of a lot of speculation.

  According to some, ALL self runners are fakes.
  According to Tiger,  Akula's device that he witnessed was not a fake.  Again, I believe him.
  That is one of the reasons that I decided to focus on that device. So, lets also try to stick with that replication effort,
as it's the only one that at least some what "proven" up to now. 
  Another reason that I previously left the TK thread. As there's was a thousand pages talk, but no action.

   

[Dog-One]

With Russian interpreter and YT link to conference I gave it is possible to follow build and tuning explanations from Ruslan himself then see where you can get with effect replication.
For Russian speakers it is quite clear. Also due almost two hours of conference it is not easy task for translation in exact radio engineering terms...

T, if you could provide the basic tuning steps and put them in order of precedence, it would be most helpful for those who wish to replicate.  Extensive details are not needed at this time, just a simple outline.  For example, there are a couple of capacitors with unmarked values, how are those values found and what do we need to look for on the oscilloscope to find them.

At the moment, I'm not sure if given a completely finished device assembled by Ruslan himself, if I could actually get it tuned and operational.  The steps in tuning are probably more important than the actual hardware.

[Zeitmaschine]

Proven to be a fake. By who???

By Kapanadze in person in front of the video camera. When a working spark is responsible for the energy output, then how can a non-working spark also be responsible for the same amount of energy output? This escapes my logic.

According to Tiger,  Akula's device that he witnessed was not a fake.  Again, I believe him.
That is one of the reasons that I decided to focus on that device.

Believing is good, knowing is better. In the Kapanadze video(s) we see exactly nothing because the part that generates the output energy is completely hidden in the tin can. Hence no surprise no one can replicate it. But surprisingly no one can replicate a device shown in plain view and explained by its creator. Ultimately something must be terrible wrong with that device and/or its creator.

This is why that Stepanov video is my favored video. Although (or because) someone took great care to degrade the image quality to an absolute minimum, I'm pretty sure what we see in that video is the real stuff, without any deception.