Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[mihai.isteniuc]

@d3x0r

See the schematics in the attachment. It's an AT computer power supply that uses TL494. you can see how this configuration works with other types of transistors. btw TL494 it's almost a must in the AT-ATX power supply units.

Or google it with AT power supply schematics -> images.

The first result: http://www.pavouk.org/hw/en_atxps.html

Use a different setup for this part. There is nothing exotic in this part of Dally's schematics. Go with the solutions in the AT-ATX to achieve your goal. The result should be the same. If you have a broken AT-ATX extract the transistors and the transformer from there cause they are a perfect fit and use them. They have been design to work together.

Mihai

PS I have modified the post because the google link, was breaking down the design of the page. Nothing was lost because of this.

Mihai

[verpies]

Or google it with AT power supply schematics -> images.

The schematics of the ATX Power Supplies are unnecessarily complicated for this purpose. 
Often they use advanced methods of driving the primary winding, e.g. a half-bridge or even full-bridge topologies.

[mihai.isteniuc]

The schematics of the ATX Power Supplies are unnecessarily complicated for this purpose. 
Often they use advanced methods of driving the primary winding, e.g. a half-bridge or even full-bridge topologies.

I agree with you. The schematics should be consulted not copied to see how they are design and maybe to match some transistors (pnp or npn, and the rest of the resistors diodes and caps) with the transformer already present in the source. Also don't take into consideration some advanced designs, more like the "chinese simplified" ones.

At some point maybe a reaction circuit dependent with the load ... will be necesary ... if the device will ever work ... also a syncronization one if I'm right. Will see ...

[d3x0r]

I agree with you. The schematics should be consulted not copied to see how they are design and maybe to match some transistors (pnp or npn, and the rest of the resistors diodes and caps) with the transformer already present in the source. Also don't take into consideration some advanced designs, more like the "chinese simplified" ones.

At some point maybe a reaction circuit dependent with the load ... will be necesary ... if the device will ever work ... also a syncronization one if I'm right. Will see ...

But, the output of the TL949 goes to power, not to any sort of drivers...


I reduced the cap size I had across the neons and am able to get higher voltage faster... but not enough to keep the neons lit and run the pulser...


Hmmm My part seems to be reverse polarity of what I needed...
http://www.semicon.panasonic.co.jp/ds4/2SB1414_BED_discon.pdf   vs [size=78%]http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/2N5401-D.PDF[/size] ...


But anyway...


I changed my load from a incandescent bulb to a string of LEDs end-to-end... I'm up to about 38V output... that's with everything running... there are very narrow bands where side A and side B are tuned to be a good frequency, and can move both together.... Although I can also not run the nanopulser and get as much power out from just the L1 oscillation... but always when I turn on my nano pulser there is not enough power to light the neons

[mihai.isteniuc]

I was making a wrong interpretation ... never mind