Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[itsu]

Itsu, can you do this test with your setup?

As a matter of fact, i did something like that tonight.
I changed my 1uF cap on L2 (resonating at 4.2Khz) to 2x 2.2uF parallel thus 4.4uF.
Now the resonance frequency of the L2 (and the inverter) was at 1.7Khz.
I then put the nano-pulser at the max. repetition frequency at which it put out some power (550V pulse) which was at 8Khz.

So i had about 4x the pulse rate as the L2/L4 frequency, but else then these more pulse/sine wave no special effect was noted even when i varied the nano-pulse frequency.
The total input of the system (measured with a wattmeter on the ATX PS 220V side) went up from 90W to 105W,
but the L1/L2/L4) amplitude went down to 100/80/10V pp while the inverter MOSFETs got much hotter.

Lateron i changed the L2 cap to 0.1uF and the resonance frequency went up to 13Khz as did the amplitude which went to 100V pp on L4, meaning about 52V dc on the output cap.
The input power went down to 78W.
I managed to dimly light a 220V/60W bulb with this.
The nano-pulser was back to its lower range (1-4Khz).

So i guess its better to run the inverter on higher frequency like you, but then the problem is the nano-pulser repetition frequency which i cannot set with any efficiency higher then 10Khz.
Perhaps if i lower the DSRD series capacitor from present 9nF to 1nF.

Lots to tune.....Regards Itsu

[Black_Bird]

@itsu

Thanks for the test. I'll see what I can do here. Maybe lower my inverter frequency and check what's the maximum frequency I can take my nanopulser.

[Black_Bird]

@verpies|
Thanks for the Gunderson Patent. That will take some time to analyze.

[verpies]

...the problem is the nano-pulser repetition frequency which i cannot set with any efficiency higher then 10Khz.
Perhaps if i lower the DSRD series capacitor from present 9nF to 1nF.

The problem with the decreased nanopulse amplitude at pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) above 5kHz is caused by insufficient time between the nanopulses for the T1's core to reset itself after saturation. 

This 5kHz PRF limit has been documented by Belkin on Pg.13 of his paper, in no uncertain terms.

[itsu]

The problem with the decreased nanopulse amplitude at pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) above 5kHz is caused by insufficient time between the nanopulses for the T1's core to reset itself after saturation. 

This 5kHz PRF limit has been documented by Belkin on Pg.13 of his paper, in no uncertain terms.

right, the mentioned part reads:


"With the amplitude of the pulse shaper up to 1 kV into 50 ohm load, with tf ~ 1 ns and a repetition rate of
up to 5.0 kHz is shown in Figure 22. Maximum f (without reducing Un) is determined by the losses in the
ferrite and heating which significantly reduces ÄV, and requires the placement of the transformer on a
radiator".


So it might be a good idea to fix the toroid on a heatsink when driving it at a higher PRF.

Regards Itsu