Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[T-1000]

It's not that bad.
A full wave bridge rectifier (FWBR) introduces only two times more effective resistance than a single diode in series with the switch S2. (referring to Diag.1 and Diag.2 below)

The amplitude of spike differs a lot between 0.001 Ohms and 0.01 Ohms resistance. And that is same when you introduce diodes before switch. The Ismael Aviso explanations are all about this.

The nanopulser can affect T1, but this influence cannot be called "shorting" anymore.

It is second stage where you actualy start doing what Romanov explained and self runners are doing.
Your transformer is current source and you introduce voltage source. Instead of shorting single source the high voltage is pulsing on opposite polarity over secondary of transformer and creating radiant spikes of much greater amplitude what are in same way as you see in shorting. This part is much more tricky to achieve but is possible to do. With proper tuning the standing wave pulses are achieved and the energy is taken to load.

At this point my previous post with Tesla quote fits here - http://www.overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg360966/#msg360966 The whole meaning is there.

P.S> It is hard to get common understanding in whole subject but eventually everyone will be there..

[Cap-Z-ro]

Would it be feasible to have a MOSFET driving a rotating switch - having a pot to regulate the gate frequency of the MOSFET for accurate tuning...thus protecting the MOSFET  ?

Regards...

[verpies]

Would it be feasible to have a MOSFET driving a rotating switch - having a pot to regulate the gate frequency of the MOSFET for accurate tuning...thus protecting the MOSFET  ?

No, a rotating switch closes and opens ~1000x slower than a MOSFET.

[Cap-Z-ro]

" No, a rotating switch closes and opens ~1000x slower than a MOSFET. "


Even if its on a high speed commuter ?

[verpies]

Even if its on a high speed commuter ?

Yes