Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

One question. What if I were to place another sensor in the other split? Could I see the offset and therefore have a visual and scope time base reading?

Definitely.
You could hit the transmitting piezo with a strong narrow rectangular electric pulse (having short rise time!) and observe on your scope how much time it takes for the acoustic pulse to reach the receiving piezo in the other gap. 
You would also see many decaying echoes, but the first received pulse is the most informative.

Of course you can use CW frequency sweeps if generating short pulses is too hard for you, but the acoustic propagation results are not as clean to observe and interpret.

P.S.
The cheapest generators of strong narrow pulses with short rise-times and long fall-times, are capacitors discharged into loads by needle spark gaps.
If you also want short fall-times on a small budget, you should reach for avalanche transistor pulsers and if you want more power and controlability by signal generators, then should consider Power MOSFETs driven by good gate drivers, such as the UCC27511.

DSRD pulsers can outperform them all, but they are neither easy nor cheap.

[ingyenenergiagep]

173kHz.
Moray wrote 186kHz.
If the triple frequency makes stronger resonance in ferrite, we need about 519-558kHz sinus driver(and/or serial wounded, "bifilar " coil on resonace freq).

[verpies]

173kHz. Moray wrote 186kHz.
If the triple frequency makes stronger resonance in ferrite, we need about 519-558kHz sinus driver(and/or serial wounded, "bifilar " coil on resonace freq).

That is very related to what Itsu and Grumage are doing here and we are well aware of Davidson's, Gunderson's and Meyer's patents.

There is a little difference, though.  Namely, Mayer is basing the operation of his device on NMR and guys here are basing their devices on NAR.  They are very similar.

I don't know if you know that the 173kHz/186kHz frequency that you have quoted is not fixed but is dependent on the dimensions of the core, its composition and the polarizing magnetic flux density that's permeating the core.

[itsu]

 

As i got many comments on my video's concerning the warming up of the choke and the use of many small capacitors instead of 1, i have used severall different thicker wire chokes and used 35x 9nF/3KV caps (totaling 300nF).

But with using the 550W load and only 12V, its obvious that all the muscle powering this load is comming from the poor battery.
Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi5a6R13P0M&feature=youtu.be

Other comments were about using a bigger core and different yokes (material i guess), but that won't be so easy.
I do have another yoke in which i have inserted inbetween the yokes halfs some mica sheets which i will use in this setup soon.

@Grumage,
i tried also a 12V / 21W bulb, but unlike yours, it lasted only 2 seconds and then it was off (filament broken) 

Regards Itsu

[verpies]

But with using the 550W load and only 12V, its obvious that all the muscle powering this load is coming from the poor battery.

That may be, but blindly changing capacitors, cores, frequencies, phases, gaps, fields and their directions is not going to change that.  It's just too many variables to coordinate.

Science works by postulating a plausible Modus Operandi and verifying it experimentally by making targeted alterations designed to accomplish that MO.
A MO creates relationships between independent variables, reducing their count by increasing their co-dependency and establishing limits on key magnitudes.

I offered a plausible MO, but if you have a better one, then go for it...just as long as there is one to aim for.