Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 112 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: Grumage on November 06, 2013, 03:04:21 PM
Try as I might I just can't get that 15 micro S distinction!! I have been pulsing the Piezo with an adjustable PWM that has the facility to go from 0-100% pulse width. I could see the decay in the receive Piezo but using a slow time base ( low PRF) the minimum distance between plot lines is 50 micro S!! Is this something we need to see or can we take it as read?
That's nothing that can be ignored. If not cleared up, it will come back and bite us later.

Maybe the piezos themselves introduce a delay.  What do you see on the scope when you press the two piezos together directly face to face with a paperclip (maybe with a mica spacer but without a ferrite core) ?

PWM generator should be set to 1kHz PRF and the duty cycle as low as you can get (e.g. 0.001%).
Of course, scope Ch1 across the transmitting piezo and Ch2 across the receiving piezo.
Triggering from Ch1. Initially horizontal timebase set so only 2 transmitting pulses are shown on the scope's screen and set faster timebase later to magnify it ( make sure the timebase is in the calibrated state!!! e.g. 100μs/div exactly ).

Grumage

Quote from: verpies on November 06, 2013, 03:13:28 PM
That's nothing that can be ignored. If not cleared up, it will come back and bite us later.

Maybe the piezos themselves introduce a delay.  What do you see on the scope when you press the two piezos together directly face to face with a paperclip (maybe with a mica spacer but without a ferrite core) ?

PWM generator should be set to 1kHz PRF and the duty cycle as low as you can get (e.g. 0.001%).
Of course, scope Ch1 across the transmitting piezo and Ch2 across the receiving piezo.
Triggering from Ch1. Initially horizontal timebase set so only 2 transmitting pulses are shown on the scope's screen and set faster timebase later to magnify it ( make sure the timebase is in the calibrated state!!! e.g. 100μs/div exactly ).

Dear Verpies.

I hope this looks ok??  :)

Cheers Grum.

verpies

Quote from: Grumage on November 06, 2013, 06:15:19 PM
I hope this looks ok??  :)
What is being measured?
Why is the rise time of the upper trace so long?


verpies

Quote from: Khwartz on November 06, 2013, 07:24:59 PM
"The load is part of the ZPE tuning" - SelfonlyPath.
Especially when using Load Controlled Oscillators (such as the Mazzilli circuit) ;)