Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 148 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: Khwartz on December 12, 2013, 07:56:04 PM

BTW, did you follow the work on the Gérard Vialle's "Autogénérateur"? Di Pascali, a Master in Physics, had testified to me having "seen" with his own eyes o.u.


What do you think?

No, I've not followed his work.

My only hope is that we learn to extract power through transmutation of matter. This is why I became interested in Bedini's energiser devices which he claimed claimed could energise batteries such that they gained more stored energy than had been input into the energiser through an electrco-chemical interchange (COP>1).  I've also been following Wesley's Coleman replication work in this field with interest.

T-1000

@d3x0r
Simulators are just waste of time for real OU research as they do not have missing functions what are not in old science.

Also seems everyone is focusing on oscillators and not on replicating power amplification GEO has. Looks a bit strange after tens of forum pages at least for me with such simple circuit, isn't... ?

Hoppy

Quote from: T-1000 on December 13, 2013, 03:58:49 AM
@d3x0r
Simulators are just waste of time for real OU research as they do not have missing functions what are not in old science.

Also seems everyone is focusing on oscillators and not on replicating power amplification GEO has. Looks a bit strange after tens of forum pages at least for me with such simple circuit, isn't... ?

??? What power amplification? Please explain given that Geo gives inadequate measurements to confirm this.

d3x0r

Quote from: T-1000 on December 13, 2013, 03:58:49 AM
@d3x0r
Simulators are just waste of time for real OU research as they do not have missing functions what are not in old science.

Also seems everyone is focusing on oscillators and not on replicating power amplification GEO has. Looks a bit strange after tens of forum pages at least for me with such simple circuit, isn't... ?
These devices within these constraints work this way.  Yes; once you put two of them together they kill each other.  But then that requires additional development on the user's part.  It can give a rough idea... and other than there's no option to make the current flow the otherway for ground to satisfy vacuum; it's a pretty good self contained tool. 


Or do you not have java and it's sour grapes?
Or am I somehow missing that a paper and pen is the only way (not even a ditigizer tablet and vector display)? 
Not only that but to not have to picture the flow in mind but get helpful hints?  I don't know what other tool would be of any less use that is being ignored by using this?  The Falstad simulator even works better than alot of SPICE implementations... for instance when a capacitor is able to fill with 0.7V, the first thing that happens is a spike of 100A for 50ns or something instead of being a smooth flow; limited by inductance of wires yaddayadda....  but the falstad actually seems to work more on the electrostatic/electromagnetic phasor model thing...  Ya if you do things that should prove out of unitity or try other things, it does fail... but you can still use it then as a diamgram tool which can spit out a quick link... And I have NO idea why I'm even bothering to ponder this.
But besides that; (as I continue to think about it)... you'd dismiss using a slide rule because the abacus can do it?  Oh No, the point was OU effects... and false indications;


I modified the coils so there was a diode half-bridge feeding the signal side (mosfet side) of the mazzilli into two coils. IN the simulator it sort of worked.  In reality it was very inefficient... I attribute it to self inductance. As it turns out, this mazziilli works both bifilar and bi-coil configurations.  and it can give you an idea of where high current (power) sinks are that might be further optimized... maybe something you don't fully picture in you telsa-perfect visual mind :p





But otherwise; I did the day he posted.  I had a similar setup.  I have a split core.  I found I could change the gap and get a better resonance; but nothing really to report home about.  So measurements would be my recommendation before other, more conservative people, approach this.