Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 154 Guests are viewing this topic.

d3x0r

that toroid inductor (w/sh)ould be no  different than a tororid transformer with another inductor not on the transformer in series ... ( to the ground? to the kacher? )  So when testing, make sure to try the coils separated... since the fluxes are shouldn't conduct... other than mounted that way, is a 'current transformer' too which is ,you know, a toroid with a cable through it... so it should have some small thing induced on it... I guess I wasn't really testing with a lot of current when measuring it so I would have gotten near a null result.

Edit3: Maybe it doesn't... the inside and outside are the same count... where a wire through a toroid is +1 on the inside... and that's totally wong direction anyway... so other than dynmically changing the permeabilibty (acceptance?)  I'd think the ferrite domains can only be one or the other...

-----------------
was playing with this falstad sim; if I open the switches to the load/lamps and charge up the circuit to a certain level, the power across the resistor is greater than the input for a while... which could imply a switching PSU could supply itself with power for a while... until...


that is a constant output power (flat line) not pulsed... the lamp is a pulsed current... and notice with the lamp lit the capacitor is still able to charge.


This is a good scheme for charging a capacitor with a constant current at every cycle.  The voltage rises steadily in a linear line... except the very beginning, it rises at an increasing rate for a little while, then flattens out. 


(picture) Link...

Oh; I do think that the negative power on the input could be recaptured in a prior resonant tank... While the input moves a lot of amps at the 5V, a lot of the work being done is from the back inductance of the resonant tank... the input power supply doesn't really have to supply as much as it's indicating(?!!??)

The sim uses large parts (1H and 3.5mF resonant tank = 60 cycle) it was just that the input clock available doesn't work over 1Khz or something... so I just built it at whatever low clock it gave me... (default is actually 40Hz, I ended up raising it to match the parts at one point to 60; and then tweaked the parts to match)

Can also add a high impedance load like LEDs across the diode....

after charging to a point, enabling the lamp and resistive/blocking oscillator loads the input power actually goes down a bit for a while, because the pressure in the cap is releived, and it takes less work to do a cycle....
----------
Was playing with some numbers... so to charge a capacitor at a higher voltage requires more energy, but the difference in energy between 100 and 99 and 1000 and 999 volts is 100x power...

using 5V from 1000V in 1uF cap is 498W / 10uS (watts for 10 uS)
using 2.5V from 2000V in 1uF cap is 499W / 10uS (watts for 10 uS)
10uS was also 100Khz

-----------
So... a guy on a swing, a small input gets him going until he can reach a spring/pump; which absorbs most of his mass, but returns it back in resonance also... the period of the swing will be the same, but delayed at the start/end instead of the bottom... until he gets up to relativistic speeds, and then his own mass increases, allowing him to impart a greater kick to the pump... but still not increasing frequency....

I think air storage is something like a square of the pressure for an energy storage factor?  Was trying to find something similar to a capacitor... a spring is kind of similar if you roll the capacitance and (?) into the spring constant 'k' then X(distance compressed) resembles voltage as an X*2... I dunno...


---
Image 2: cloned circuit, one with +/- caps to ground, the other monopolar, negative bias... this(monopole) charges faster, because of flyback against the diode plus the next cycle; there's an AC wave over it all; think it captured when the positive(what should be green) looked negative (red) on the negative cap... I don't see anything wrong in the diode configuration... maybe I had toggled a switch somewhere at that time... uhmm.. I dunno the +1kv side should be green.

T-1000

The problem with the all simulations is - it cannot simulate ferroresonance and parametric resonance properly. In old tiger's videos those two things are used extensively and exploitation of magnetostriction is also taking place.. ;)

d3x0r

Quote from: T-1000 on December 07, 2014, 03:13:17 AM
The problem with the all simulations is - it cannot simulate ferroresonance and parametric resonance properly. In old tiger's videos those two things are used extensively and exploitation of magnetostriction is also taking place.. ;)
True enough it is only an approximation; and many things are just off the board.  But this is (essentially) how this is working; with antenna inductance... I mean the kacher is a stepup to 1k or something; and the few loop antenna to the grenade should be another step-up; which my direct connection loses.... although improves the Q of power transfer...


what is A wire itself's capacitive voltage limit? 
At this point my bench is really no better than the sim, since it's tied so loosely with test clips which are long 1Ghz inductors... Have been pairing down and simplifiying connection and have better output...


Kinda the point is... it can provide more power than it's using to keep itself charged... but ideally it wouldn't use any more power than it had to so that would stay over-charged longer, while still reducing the input requirements for a little while... and that's because there's a tremendous power oscillating in the wire that is the grenade (ideally; how it works in the sim) so that will charge the output for a while until it balances against the new low point... then the input will need more power at which point *bang it collapses?*

Jeg

Quote from: d3x0r on December 07, 2014, 03:29:40 AM
capacity in parallel with diode

Dr3x
I have seen that you put a capacitor in parallel with diode. How this combination work? I 'd like to tune a circuit which needs less capacitance than my rectification diode has. If i put a cap of some pf in parallel with my rect. diode, wouldn't  this disturb the rectification operation?
Tnks

d3x0r

Quote from: Jeg on December 07, 2014, 06:27:55 AM
Dr3x
I have seen that you put a capacitor in parallel with diode. How this combination work? I 'd like to tune a circuit which needs less capacitance than my rectification diode has. If i put a cap of some pf in parallel with my rect. diode, wouldn't  this disturb the rectification operation?
Tnks
not really ; the diode itself is a tiny capacitor so...
adding another small capacitance in parallel ... if it's too big, the voltage won't build high enough and it'll be flat... if the capacitor between kacher and grenade is X, the parallel capacitor should also be X or smaller.

It worked alright.... I ended up being able to up 2nF caps and get a decent output; but now I'm only using 25-400pF transfer... so it's not really big enough to count in the resonance... it's kinda how caps work in the LMD (longitundinal magneto something) Dollard transmission line thng...

if you're not direct connected with a capacitor, it won't help you


you can add a tiny cap in series with the diode which will give it less capacitance....