Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Stela]

"Hi all. One interpretation of Kapadnadze's earlier devices is that applying high voltage pulsing through a sparkgap to
a coil wound on a ferrite core causes some process to happen inside the ferrite which releases excess energy into the
system, which can then be used to power a load. "

Tous peux libérer de l'energie. Tout est énérgie. Seul le médium naturel change.

"The following short video shows some preliminary tests I am doing to put this concept to the test. The video shows that
arcing increases the input current draw to the flyback driver circuit, as well as tests whether placing a ferrite yoke core
directly in a sparkgap arc causes any noticeable excess power to be available to a load."


Un arc électrique ne peux pas créer de l'énergie mais juste en transporter. Un arc « est » de la chaleur, la chaleur « est » de la perte !!

"Conducted two basic tests:
Part 1 - Test to see if sparkgap arc distance affects the current draw on the flyback driver.
Demonstrates that with a wide sparkgap the input current increases to roughly 0.7 A to 0.9 A or so. The input current draw to the flyback driver
increases more and more as I make the sparkgap distance shorter and shorter. With a very short sparkgap distance the arc is more concentrated
and intense, which causes more current to flow through the sparkgap, and the 24W (actually 35W) halogen bulb starts to light. The input current draw increases
to about 1.3 A with a very narrow sparkgap distance, while the halogen bulb is lighting. The halogen bulb is not lighting very brightly however."

Normal effet classique. Eclairs= pertes 

"Part 2 - Test to see if placing a ferrite core directly in the sparkgap arc can provide any extra power to a load. This is based on the concept that
stimulating a ferrite core with high voltage, high frequency pulses can cause the ferrite core to emit extra energy into the system due to the
HV (high stress) pulsing of the ferrite magnetic domains. I placed a ferrite yoke core-half in the direct path of the sparkgap arc to see if I could get
any more power delivered to the load. The arc was hitting the edge of the ferrite core and bending around it. With the sparkgap distance set short,
the halogen light bulb lighted, but it was not noticeably any brighter than without the ferrite core in the arc path. Input current draw to the flyback
driver was also around 1.3 A or a bit higher when the halogen bulb was lighting the brightest, but no increased power to the load was noticed. "

Normal l'électricité va au plus court.

Bonne continuation...

[eugene900]

hi everyone,

There seems to be improvement in PLL circuit diagram released which can be used for Ruslan device.

This morning i just tested out the nanosecond generator in virtual using 74HC132 which is little more simple than my design(less 2 diodes).

The PLL in this circuit is designed to lock onto frequency between 17khz to 42khz.

My experiment revealed the blue toroid is the best one i have in order to generate nice moustache waveform for LM393 or better waveform using TLC272.

-----------------------------------------
The short tesla coil i have previously assembled merely generate around 1.3kv at 30volts using nanosecond pulse at around 27khz  to base of transistor 2SC5200.
I have made a wrong move by removing couple of turns in order to increase frequency to around 1.7Mhz with Antenna.

Using my another tesla coil with few hundred turns(resonance at around 533khz) combine with nanosecond generator did produced "negative ions".

By placing finger near coil i can feel "cool breeze" without getting burned or shocked as long i don't touch wire.
I am very sure by placing small incense candle nearby i can easily make fire to flicker.
The voltage generated from this coil is peaking around 2kv...3kv at 12volts .

where found transformers and coils data used in this shematic?

[NickZ]

I yesterday speak with Ruslan and Ruslan everything explain how need made divice on 1 kW.
Need generator like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtjlIkgLJ7M who making 4-5 pulses, then pause, then again 4-5 pulses with frenquency push pull (27 kiloherc on Ruslan divice). Resonant capasitor 0,47 uF. Inducor 10 meters. Output coil 40 meters. Tesla coil can be 20 meters for 0.7 wire and 40 meters for 0.5 wire. Inductor on Tesla coil have 6 turns, wound turn to turn, with about 1 cm gap betwenn primary and secondary. On plus Tesla coil inductor go 24 volts. All system 24 volts.
First need wound of aliuminum plate on tube one turn not shorted. Then wound output coil, but always wound in same direction now. It have 6 layers, but now always need wound in same direction. Then inductor begin from same direction wound like multilayer coil, then gose to end, go back and wound again, in other words Tesla bifilar coil inductor is. Aluminum one turn go to ground. Multilayer coil first layer go to ground. Indutcot throught resistor go to graund, but if no automatic resonance ajustion, then resistor is not nessary, it needed to not burn generators, then signal gose from ferite ring secondary mounted on 3 turns resonans windings. On output multilayer coil is 0.22 uF capasitor and from it gose to hight speed 4 diodes and then on output is DC curent (can be capasitor 10 uF after diodes) and that gose to load and 220 to 24 volts power supply.

  Wow! Thanks MenofFather.  Many changes to the way we had made the grenade previously.  I never believed that all those inverted polarity turns made ANY difference, and this new all one direction windings of the grenade coils (6), confirms this.

  Hopefully you can continue to be able to contact Ruslan in the future, for more "details".

[MenofFather]

  Wow! Thanks MenofFather.  Many changes to the way we had made the grenade previously.  I never believed that all those inverted polarity turns made ANY difference, and this new all one direction windings of the grenade coils (6), confirms this.

  Hopefully you can continue to be able to contact Ruslan in the future, for more "details".

Ruslan say something that, that inverted polarity turns is better. Its seems give higher voltage on output. I not know then oher time I again speek with Ruslan. That be looky moment.[/size]

[magpwr]

Ruslan say something that, that inverted polarity turns is better. Its seems give higher voltage on output. I not know then oher time I again speek with Ruslan. That be looky moment.[/size]

hi MenofFather,

It seems Ruslan gave false information from the begining related to tesla coil frequency 1.5...1.7Mhz.

After creating a circuit which perfectly sync tesla coil detected frequency and divide by 60 or 50 and produce signal for my prototype PWM circuit with dual channel output 20% to 45% duty.
The only thing achieved was a flickering bulb at a certain frequency also similar to what hoppy have achieved as well using manual pwm tuning approach.

The approach which i now believe may work is using the high voltage in kv pulsing approach either via tesla coil or dally's nanosecond pulse approach using coaxial cable with shorted end.

Take note at 30volts power supply i merely got 1.3kv nanosecond pulse from tesla coil antenna(Short telsa coil ~7cm 20AWG.Maybe i should not have shorten tesla coil).
But what if coil was powered by 150volts or 5 times more input voltage.Maybe 1.3kv pulse would become 1.3kv x 5 =6.5kv  if we are lucky.

*********High voltage probe is needed for scope****************

I think dally approach is better if we are using ideal component for pulsing at high frequency.My nanosecond generator is able to provide repetition pulse at 50khz easily using recently posted attachment.Now i have design pcb using RF mosfet and RF mosfet driver $$ which runs at 50Mhz max which is overkill for this application.

The reason why i say dally approach is better is because Antenna with huge gap to multilayer  coil is not needed.This gap itself creates a lost.

The coaxial cable can be wound directly over the 48 turns bifilar layer .

But Dally old pulse generation circuit should not be used.