Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Acca]

Spark arc transmutation is very real links posted .. and it is again Iron ...

The first time that the CMNS community heard about carbon arc experiments was probably in 1994 when Fusion Technology published two related papers. One was by Raghavan Sundaresan, of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in Mubai, India, working with John O'Mara Bockris at Texas A&M University. The other was by Mahavir Singh and colleagues of the BARC spectroscopy division.[/font]
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/GrabiakIE92.pdf

http://www.ohsawamacrobiotics.com/earticles/Transmutation-ExtraComments-b.pdf

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2008/28img/Esko-IE-Article-March2008.pdf

The carbon-arc experiments are remarkably simple. Disarmingly simple. Embarrassingly simple.

In the experiments reported in Fusion Technology, two ultrapure graphite electrodes were connected to an electrical source. The rods were submerged in ultrapure water, and an arc was permitted to travel between the two rods. After a few hours, a residue collected at the bottom of the container. On spectrographic analysis, researchers found that the residue contained significant amounts of iron.

Pre-experiment analysis showed minimal iron content in the rods: 2 parts per million. Post-experiment analysis showed iron content in the rods at 200-2000 parts per million. That's, at a minimum, a 100:1 signal-to-background ratio.

Where did the iron come from? And how did it transmute from other elements in the experimental environment?

[/font]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWag5SNvx8U

Acca. ...
[/font]

[NickZ]

  " AND THE LIST GOES ON ! NOW WHERE IS THIS OVER UNITY ?"
                                                                      end quote.

    THAT's just what we are all waiting for YOU to show us, what you're talking about, to ALL the Threads  in OU>.com. 
    I hope that you can...  and not just more airy theories.  The proof is in the pudding...

[Dog-One]

I consider anything that makes sense and it does not have to be mainstream.
For example this.

Very revealing.

http://rs2theory.org/electronics/electrostatics

Thanks for the link!

[verpies]

Very revealing.
http://rs2theory.org/electronics/electrostatics
Thanks for the link!

If you like this line of thinking then this guy has expressed all the SI units in terms of space and time.
There is only one discrepancy with the RS2 theory and it has been discussed on this forum and this one.

[verpies]

The same answer, the Aether.  Believe it, or not,  I aim to prove it. With "conviction", like Hoppy says.  This involves the belief in an Aether, the vortex theory, and the ability of tapping of the existing surrounding energy fields. 

It is clear that you believe in matter being surrounded by aether, just like fish are surrounded by water in a 3D aquarium.
...but your model is incomplete because it does not even consider what matter is composed of and what "fields" are.

P.S.
What would you like to know about Thorium?