Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[T-1000]

Such windings create magnetic flux like on Diag.4a.
The center tap does not need to be grounded.

The Kapanadze grenade coil is a bit different than that. One of the halves get CW+CCW windings in halfs which partially cancel out itself. And the 3rd CW+CCW partially cancel out cancelling coil which is "counterweight" for main coils. So the resulting magnetic field is only partially following that diagram. If you make one and put under 3d magnetic field analyzer probes the summary picture would be very interesting...

P.S> The cancellation nodes are standing(scalar) wave nodes so in D. Smith style there is 1, in Kapanadze style there are 3 of them. For a training material to understand this stuff here is one of experiment videos - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avvVH6xspIE

[NickZ]

  After building the grenade/yoke/kacher circuits and coils, I see no cancellation effect.
With or without the Kacher running, there is no difference as far as the current draw, in the rest of the push-pull system. Same current and voltage is being drawn through the device. With my fets burning up, at even a low output mode when using only 2, 100w, 120v incandescent bulbs.
  So, what is supposed to happens when you build the device coils, as stated, with all the different inverse cancellation turns.  Nothing happens, as far as I can see, so far.  As my Kacher, nor all those inverse turns, do not help to reduce the total device draw, which is still at about 10 amps, or higher, while inefficiently lighting of incandescent bulbs, and overheating the fets.
  I've reduced my Kacher secondary to about 1/3 less turns, and still no difference that I can see.
  A bit frustrating...  but, so what.
 
   Edit:
   One more observation: On my Mazilli push-pull oscillator, and the connected yoke coils.
   WITHOUT the Kacher/ grenade coils attached,  the above mentioned push-pull oscillator, and yoke cores, will out perform the addition of the grenade/kacher circuits, every time.
  Plus, my fets run much cooler while providing more light (lumin) levels, without the grenade/kacher circuit and coils attached.  So, far what I observe has only been a reduction of output, by the above mentioned additional coils, and circuits.  The addition of the grenade coils, and Kacher, can add higher voltage to the output at the bulbs, but at the expense of the amps. 
So, Not really what is supposed to be happening.   But, I now realize that all of this may be normal, and so I'm still looking for the illusive sweet spot, (even without my scope). That should make the difference.
My scope is not being brought to me until Aug., so another month to wait.
   
   

[verpies]

The Kapanadze grenade coil is a bit different than that.

He was asking about his "picture" and my answer referred directly to his question.

I would like to have some opinions about the component in the picture below.

[T-1000]

  So, what is supposed to happens when you build the device coils, as stated, with all the different inverse cancellation turns.  Nothing happens, as far as I can see, so far.  As my Kacher, nor all those inverse turns, does not help to reduce the devices draw, which is still at 10 amps, or higher, while inefficiently lighting of incandescent bulbs.

How much amps it is drawing with grenade coils disconnected?

[starcruiser]

Since I do not have the ferrite Rod core yet, can anyone check the resonance with and without this inductor in place and report the results for the Tesla secondary (resonant point with and without) as well as the Grenade coil reaction? I figure the grenade coil might increase in output as a result, the antenna coil should be tested for its resonant point as well. If this is what I think,  the coiled, non grounded antenna would need to be tuned as well, especially if the SWR needs to be at a certain level. Remember this is RF theory now, treat the antenna as real antenna and tune it. The inductor is to isolate the antenna from the output stage (transmitter), i.e. impedance matching.