Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 195 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on July 07, 2015, 06:35:27 PM
I'm afraid you have forgotten something important: Provable OU is already here: Free energy from air TEST, just not enough of it (yet).

Now tell me, how much energy would that Avramenko plug setup be able to collect if we would connect 1000 of them together? How much energy could it collect, if we could charge up those capacitors 1000 times a second?

To put it another way: What parameter defines the intensity of the electric field collected in the capacitors per time unit?

Although this is real OU, I think there are a lot of fakes around. And most of those fakers are payed fakers. Almost no one would spent lots and lots of time and money to do elaborate fake videos on youtube just for fun. So who pays for the making of those fake videos? Someone (the oil syndicate) who knows for sure that OU can work indeed, so he sees a need for massive distraction that pushes researchers in a completely wrong direction? A lot of hints on youtube and the forums pointing towards that. One of the payed team produces the video presenting the fake device (looks valid at first glance, but turns out to be complete nonsense at second glance), then some others of the team are flooding the forums with discussions about that fake device, so all other target-aimed ideas are getting lost in tons of gibberish. This gets increasingly apparent over time. Remember, Dally has dismantled his device almost three years ago, 6 days after his »OU« demonstration. Why? Because he had done his job?

Zeit,

The secondary side circuit of the transformer in your posted circuit schematic is high impedance, so its not surprising that any increase in current drawn in the primary winding is very minimal and maybe not registered at all, depending on what instrument is used to measure it.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on July 07, 2015, 06:35:27 PM
I'm afraid you have forgotten something important: Provable OU is already here: Free energy from air TEST, just not enough of it (yet).

Now tell me, how much energy would that Avramenko plug setup be able to collect if we would connect 1000 of them together? How much energy could it collect, if we could charge up those capacitors 1000 times a second?

To put it another way: What parameter defines the intensity of the electric field collected in the capacitors per time unit?

Although this is real OU, I think there are a lot of fakes around. And most of those fakers are payed fakers. Almost no one would spent lots and lots of time and money to do elaborate fake videos on youtube just for fun. So who pays for the making of those fake videos? Someone (the oil syndicate) who knows for sure that OU can work indeed, so he sees a need for massive distraction that pushes researchers in a completely wrong direction? A lot of hints on youtube and the forums pointing towards that. One of the payed team produces the video presenting the fake device (looks valid at first glance, but turns out to be complete nonsense at second glance), then some others of the team are flooding the forums with discussions about that fake device, so all other target-aimed ideas are getting lost in tons of gibberish. This gets increasingly apparent over time. Remember, Dally has dismantled his device almost three years ago, 6 days after his »OU« demonstration. Why? Because he had done his job?

What you are showing -- the AV plug -- is not OU. There is a real energy source that is being tapped by the antenna, and the AV plug is rectifying and storing energy from that source. The source is typically RF in the environment. It certainly isn't from "the AIR".  The AV plug doesn't typically respond to the DC gradient of the Earth's field itself. For even more effective demonstrations of actually tapping the Earth's electric field gradient you can look at the electret motors of Jefimenko, or electrostatic motors from several experimenters on YT. Any Ham Radio operator knows that you can get powerful sparks just from the antenna lead-in coax without any special circuitry at all. This is _not_ OU! It might be "free energy" since you aren't paying for it... but somebody is, in the case of the AV plug. The Earth's field gradient is a different story... tapping that would be, in my opinion, truly "free energy".
My "Aussie Radio" crystal set lights up an LED _and_ produces audio output! Does that qualify as OU in your definition? Many of the circuits that Akula and Ruslan have presented act quite well as _receivers_ of broadcast power, and let's not forget that Ruslan is a radio engineer working at a commercial FM radio station -- he has even shown us the transmitter room of that station. How much power do you think is available "in the air" in the near field of the transmitting antenna of that station? If he lights up a few LEDs while standing next to the antenna tower... is that OU? No, of course not. Free energy? A few milliwatts subtracted from a total radiated power of... some large number of kilowatts? Right.

Zeitmaschine

Would be interesting to see if »Free Energy from Air« could also work in outer space.

Quote from: Hoppy on July 08, 2015, 03:25:38 AM
The secondary side circuit of the transformer in your posted circuit schematic is high impedance, so its not surprising that any increase in current drawn in the primary winding is very minimal and maybe not registered at all, depending on what instrument is used to measure it.

Yes, pure voltage generates energy in form of a spark. But normally pure voltage should not do that.

T-1000

Hi all,

Just noticed the thread is going into fake/not fake discussion again.
If instead of lots of posting would be lots of testing the definitive answer would much closer.. The investment of time and hard work is needed here and only posting does zero contribution to it.

Zeitmaschine

Simple as that: No discussions about unproven (Kapanadze) replications are allowed. If one claims to have a working replication then first prove it beyond all doubt - after that we can discuss it.