Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 163 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: Jeg on October 05, 2015, 07:09:24 AM
Hi Hoppy
I am not answering for T1000 as I am also interested in where T1000 have read this info. But, it is fair to say that the only thing that will change by the different coil setups is the choice of the right harmonic. In some cases if you like to tune in higher frequencies, T1000's suggestion is more appropriate as it will give a lower inductance and so you have the ability to tune to a higher frequency than with a grenade wounded as suggested by John.K for example. It is a matter of personal taste and design.

Hi Jeg,

In view of T1000's reply (that he can only go on the old conference notes) and John.K1's post saying that Ruslan corrected himself by saying the winding that way (old way) de-stabilize the system and reduce the power, IMO it makes sense to go for a uni-directional winding.

T-1000

Quote from: Hoppy on October 05, 2015, 08:16:10 AM
Hi Jeg,

In view of T1000's reply (that he can only go on the old conference notes) and John.K1's post saying that Ruslan corrected himself by saying the winding that way (old way) de-stabilize the system and reduce the power, IMO it makes sense to go for a uni-directional winding.

I would stick to grenade coil which was described in teamspeak notes for a few reasons - the inductance is ment to be reaching 0 intentionaly in Kapanadze coil and it is first configuration where effect is reached. When you will see effect yourself it can be improved later like Ruslan was playing around with different mods for it.
The https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NLBSBRsBM reveals the original coil configuration.

Jeg

Quote from: Hoppy on October 05, 2015, 08:16:10 AM
Hi Jeg,

In view of T1000's reply (that he can only go on the old conference notes) and John.K1's post saying that Ruslan corrected himself by saying the winding that way (old way) de-stabilize the system and reduce the power, IMO it makes sense to go for a uni-directional winding.

Can you please describe it by cw and ccw terminology? I mean the uni directional winding. If you mean that winding all the layers in one direction, then someone normally will find lower resonant frequencies and will output higher voltage.

Jeg

Quote from: T-1000 on October 05, 2015, 08:20:14 AM
I would stick to grenade coil which was described in teamspeak notes for a few reasons - the inductance is ment to be reaching 0 intentionaly in Kapanadze coil and it is first configuration where effect is reached. When you will see effect yourself it can be improved later like Ruslan was playing around with different mods for it.
The https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NLBSBRsBM reveals the original coil configuration.

Sorry T1000 but can you specify in cw ccw terminology the first working kapanadje coil and then the teams proposal?

Hoppy

Quote from: Jeg on October 05, 2015, 08:47:26 AM
Can you please describe it by cw and ccw terminology? I mean the uni directional winding. If you mean that winding all the layers in one direction, then someone normally will find lower resonant frequencies and will output higher voltage.

I'm suggesting either cw,cw,cw or ccw,ccw,ccw. Uni / one direction.

Both uni-directional and fully bucking (T1000 suggested) configurations are worth trying.