Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

That is 1600 volt peaks, rectified unipolar pulses.  Single wire, no closed loops, therefore amperage is flat zero, no electron flow and no magnetic field, purely electric agitation of the Aether.

Hi D-1. I have experimented quite a bit with one wire AC power transmission etc., and in my experience
current is still flowing even though you don't have an obvious closed loop. In other words, power is still being drawn
from the AC power source even in one wire AC power transmission. I think that if you do a simple setup and place
a current transformer/current probe on the single wire you will see that there is still a current on the wire.

This concept is used in radio for example. You can use a long single wire as both a transmitting and receiving antenna
for a radio. When transmitting via the single wire, power is definitely still consumed from the transmitter by the
single wire antenna. It is maybe a different kind of current than we think of in regards to a closed DC circuit, but
it is a characteristic of AC current that it can flow down a single wire and power can therefore be transmitted
through a single wire. This also can be seen in the case where a light bulb can light with only one wire connected
to a HV transformer and the other wire from the light bulb can just be connected to a short length of wire or just
to a piece of metal, etc., and under the right conditions the bulb will still light.  In such a case the bulb is still drawing
its power from the the HV AC transformer.

That is not to say that this isn't useful to us however in trying to achieve over unity.
The video I referenced earlier where the Russian guy showed that he could (apparently) light something
like a 40W filament light bulb quite brightly using an extra coil attached to a tesla coil and while only drawing
a few Watts of power from his power supply seems to show that there is possibly some real potential in there
(pardon the pun ) . I am personally hesitant about using terms like 'radiant energy' and 'cold electricity' etc.
without good reason, but there would seem to be something unusual going on there, whatever is going on.
I am referring to this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP5FiCbLu5M
Nelson seems to be showing a similar sort of effect...

[dezeinstein]

Maybe, this is right wire direction.

This wire correction can't possibly work. It has to energize the coils and bulb, not put ground to both sides of it.  Follow the circuit correction wiring to see what I am talking about (Looking at your schematic update, If you put the wire to the grounded side of the fwbr, it carries ground from the fwbr through the coils, through the bulb, then back to ground.) Originally, the voltage would have ended up being 220v  leading to L8 and then in series through L7, then through the bulb and then to ground which would energize the bulb and coils.. The bulb is grounded already and doesn't need both sides of the coils grounded otherwise the energy wouldn't make it to the bulb (unless you have come up with some new magical way of collecting energy that nobody knows of!) To make this circuit function correctly, we need to have a frequency interaction to provide assistance from the modulation of both the 50hz pulse train which is inserted into the connection between L1 and L2 to provide the positive means for the coils to energize, and the negative pulse from the function generator to create an energy of it's own. This is used in the beginning of the circuit, then has to be used again and matched out of phase at the end of the circuit to create a difference in potential, so we could utilize this "difference" to do the work. It actually is a helper circuit that eliminates the additional load from the inverter and allows the mix of the two frequencies to do the work at the bulb. I do feel that both sides of the circuit will need spark gaps.. One before L4 and another between the connection from the inverter and L1/L2 coils otherwise the modulation and/or the assistance circuit won't be of any assistance to the output. The modulation could always be done in other ways, such as by applying an adhesive foil half way covering a toroid for one frequency, and the other half for another frequency, then, third from the input. Some of these circuits function by the addition of multiple frequencies, some are carrier frequencies and those frequencies output naturally their harmonics all the way up to the 21st harmonic if the amplification is strong enough or the energy input is powerful enough. When we introduce rf carrier frequencies, they multiply by inducing energy from these frequencies via the Schumann resonances through all of the coils used. We tune into these frequencies, and once we find resonance for the right frequency, the energy starts to flow. We may not get the most out of this circuit, however, if we spend the time to find tuning capacitors of the correct sizes, we could tune into a pretty substantial amount of power for our output. When this happens, there are not only one or two frequencies, there are hundreds if not thousands of them flowing through the circuit simultaneously. They all have a specific amount of energy drawn into them, all dependent upon the tuning and the input power driven to the circuit. If the power is small, the output is small. If the power is substantial, depending upon the carrier frequencies modulated will affect the output with different results, hpowever, you will have much luck if you input a substantial power and voltage to the circuit, then the energy drawn in will be matched between all the diffrent frequencies modulated. The helper circuit (at the function generator) may only input 3 or 4 watts of energy and hardly any voltage, but, it allows energy magnification to happen. This energy on a scope look like a bunch of wavy noise, but it will do work just as long as we use a bonified input with some ass behind it, such as the inverter.

[Zeitmaschine]

but there would seem to be something unusual going on there, whatever is going on.
I am referring to this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP5FiCbLu5M

Why only one bulb? He should connect a wooden board full of 100W incandescent light bulbs to his spade, maybe he could borrow one from Kapanadze.

[Void]

Why only one bulb? He should connect a wooden board full of 100W incandescent light bulbs to his spade, maybe he could borrow one from Kapanadze.

It is comments like this from various people here that make me think I am just wasting my time... 
This sort of thing happens way too often here unfortunately....

      

[Void]

I realize that a joule thief circuit can run on just a few mAs, but it won't light up even a single 3v, 30mA led bulb brightly. 

Hi Nick. Lighting low power LEDs or LED bulbs with a blocking oscillator is actually nothing too special.
Lighting say 25W or higher filament light bulbs brightly with very low power consumption in the order of a few watts
is not normal however. If you are interested, take a close look at the video I posted a link to couple of posts back.
It seems there might be something worth looking into going on there... It seems Nelson is also employing a similar
approach in his device...


P.S. In case anyone is curious what the efficiency is for the blocking oscillator circuit lighting the 10 LEDs
which I included a picture of, it measured out as:
Input power:   9.2 mW
Output Power: 4.9 mW
Efficiency: 4.9/9.2 x 100 = 53.3%
If I add some more LEDS to the output I can maybe get the efficiency higher.