Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

2. Your Cree MOSFET has a 25V max voltage for gate-source, with a 4V threshold. What a 22V input will offer more compared to a 12 or to a 15V gate peak? 

+22V will turn on the MOSFET proportionally faster than 12V.
-22V will turn it-off faster and keep it turned off even if high dv/dt appears on the drain.

[NickZ]

  Verpies:
  Could it be that the advantages of using a very low duty cycle has little or nothing to do with economizing on the input?
  Perhaps it has more to do with the longer OFF times, providing for more time for the BEMF to do it's job. Instead?
  BTW: Is there even such a thing as BEMF, at all.  Or just EMF or electro/magnetic pulse, instead.
  I know that you know much more than what you are stating here on this thread. "Don't be shy"...
   

[verpies]

My interest is in the "sound of the IRON particles" in the ferrite CORE, and like you I am convinced that the energy is from an INTER-ATOMIC source of electrons made by audio resonance and by audio cavitation.

Dude!, there is nothing "inter-atomic" about neutrons. 
Free neutrons are nasty.  They are all that Nick is afraid of and this time I'd share his trepidations.

@All
Please do not conflate free neutrons with NMR or NAR or stimulated beta emission McFreey style...which are benign in comparison to free neutrons.

[NickZ]

   T-1000:
  Perhaps the "movement of electrons" is not the cause of the extra energy. I don't recall Tesla ever mentioning that, nor giving credence to that idea.  Ions, may be the subject to further look into, or the cause of the polarization effects of the gain medium, instead. Or not?
  In any case I'm still intrigued by Nelson device, only using such a low input from the PS, (12v, 0.5 Amps), 6 watts  to light the incandescent bulb. Although I can do the same just using just my Kacher. But, using a bit higher amperage to light a 100w bulb, as I've shown.

  Verpies: And yet, are you forgetting that McFreely stated about NOT NEEDING to use NMR, nor NAR to extract energy from the "gain materials". I can post his statements, if needed.

[Hoppy]

   Could be as well.  In any case I doubt that any one will be replicating it. As only T asked the questions to understand it's workings.  While others don't believe him,  as to it's mode of operations.
So keep looking for that battery or cap, until you get tired of getting nowhere, again. What fun...

Here is what I've so far deduced through the glass: -

You will recall that Nelson said his device was not running on free energy. That leaves the distinct possibility that there is an internal source of energy that he may have found a way of maintaining through feedback, or not. The RHS box in the demo contains a transformer connected to a push-pull which operates as a simple inverter, with the transformer secondary winding appearing to drive the halogen lamp directly. The push-pull is connected to the LHS box with the black link cable seen at the back between the two boxes. The likely source of power could be contained in the black box with the high voltage sticker on top. The halogen bulb is likely a J-class low voltage (36V) R7s, Notice how bright the lamp shines on first connection and then dims down with a voltmeter reading of around 36V. The inverter transformer secondary output voltage is likely being pulled-down by the current draw. The other unit in the RHS box is a cheapo Chinese PSU with its lid off, purpose so far unknown. The 9V battery operates a relay which starts the device.