Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

Hi all,

I have a doubt. In this patent referenced by NoMoreSlave ( http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg400934/#msg400934 ) induction is produced by emulating a rotary magnetic field into a central induced coil. This emulation is based on switch ON/OFF a sequence of inducing coils.

I think that this is not the same than having a real rotating magnetic field induced revolving around the central induced coil. With a real rotating magnetic field (as the one created by NoMoreSlave´s idea of placing the coils at right angles with a Sine + Cosine wave) the field really rotate and the field cut the wires perpendiculary creating a real induction  -->  E = B·v·Length· sin(alfa)   ; alfa = 90º , angle between B and v ; sin(alfa) = 1 (Induction by Flux Cutting the wires, as done in current generators)

In the case of switching ON/OFF the inducing coils the field "seems" to rotate macroscopically but, in fact, each magnetic field is created and collapsed and the magnetic field lines cross through the wires but these lines do not cut the wires perpendiculary, therefore, I think that maybe the induction will be null because in this case: the angle alfa = 0º, and therefore sin(alfa) = 0 --> E = 0.

I really think that the idea of placing the coils at right angles with a Sine and a Cosine waves (as proposed by NoMoreSlave in post #1261) to create a rotating magnetic field could probably be what Figuera used in his patents.

What is your opinion? Please comment

[marathonman]

Randy;
You test your outputs with a LED after the resistor to the Transistor. all my boards are 5 volt so i was good to go as i designed them to be low power.
Keep testing at that level as Figueras used 100 volts @ 1 amp. i used MJH11020's for my project but the MJH11022's can handle more voltage.
the cheapest place i found them are at http://www.futureelectronics.com/en/technologies/semiconductors/discretes/transistors/darlington/Pages/5513205-MJH11022G.aspx?IM=or you can use MJ11028 through 33 at http://futurlec.com/TransPowerMJE.shtml.
and if you really want to get froggy try ESM3030DV for the Biggest bang for your buck 400 volts @ 100 amp's of pure balls to the wall.
Be free, Act free and FIGUERAS your ass off.

[RandyFL]

20 May 14 / 20:15:02

Thanks MarathonMan:
I was asking Avengers how He was testing his...
I too used low voltages until everything worked on a breadboard...

But my question to you is what did you use as transformer(s)?

All the Best
RandyFL

[RandyFL]

20 May 14 / 20:55:01
MarathonMan:
After dinner I looked at the specs of the ESM3030DV... WOW! That's plenty enough juice to power things up a bit. :-) That's more power than anybody would need for their own use... Businesses could use em in sets or more...

All the Best
RandyFL

[NRamaswami]

Hanon:

First I must apologize to you and Nomoreslave. Without the postings from you both, I would not have tested the square electromagnet. I actually wanted to test it like a toroid but because of you, I tested it as a square. Whether a toroid will work or not I have not tested. So the credit for the square magnet must go to you and Nomoreslave.

Regarding what kind of magnet was y magnet used by Figuera, the patent provides the instruction that the device is free from Lenz law. Lenz law is not applicable to magnetic field flowing between opposite poles. However there is no need to ignore the square magnet or toroid type of magnet with a central iron core going between the two identical pole primaries if the primary wires were connected to the Earth. In that case alone, we can provide 100 volts and 1 amps as input to get the 20000 watts output reported by Buforn. 100 volts and 1 amp input can generate about 400 to 500 volts and low amperages typically in the secondary. 100 volts and 15 amps input may provide 600 volts and 20 amps output possibly in the secondaries without the Earth connection.

As you are aware my coils are large coils to replicate the Figuera device and they run to 6 feet to 7.5 feet length when built and tested. I believe that this kind of size matters although I need to concede that I'm not a competent person and the designs I made are very inefficient and can be made more efficient by technically competent persons.

In my assumption, if the earth is used as the source for free electrons, then the device could have used identical poles and square type of secondary magnets with very large primary cores that completely surround the Y square magnet with the iron rods facing each other. the large thick coil shown to protrude through the secondary and to cover the part of the two primaries would then have been used to prevent the electromagnets from moving away and to secure the identical poles to remain in position. So given the kind of Iron core indicated in the drawing and the fact that I assume that the Earth is the Al origin, Figurea could have used the identical poles and square magnets for the Y magnet.

In one earlier posting Marathonman showed that the primaries have iron rods that completely encircle the secondary with the magnetic fields flowing in between. That is how I had tested in July 2013. The coiling arrangements were of course different.

I will test the earth connections some time when I can and then would provide the details. This invention is not patentable today. No point would be served by applying for patents. There are several patents that are granted for perpetual motion devices like equipment which had one or two conditions added to avoid that problem and many patents had been granted like that earlier. So rather than filing a patent application, I intend to simply provide the information here. Those who want to test and replicate and see let them verify it. It is so simple.