Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Fernandez]

Bajac........... With all do respect. You will go nowhere with that build. But please dont take my word for it discover yourself.

[bajac]

Fernandez,


Why are you so emotional?


My only polite request to you was to present some concrete data of your experiments proving your claims. You have said a lot but I do not understand it, does anyone?


You can be sure I will not take your word. And there is nothing wrong with that. If you do not agree with whatever I stated or posted, it is ok with me. I consider it a good thing because if I am wrong, then you can correct me. However, there is a professional and acceptable way for doing it. Instead of going with personal attacks, why don't you present your finding to the forum in a clear form? Not the type of fuzzy statements you are making above.


Bajac

[hanon]

As Figuera stated (and I will paraphrase) "The primary is an exciter coil and excites the secondary, and THIS is also a exciting coil"
Figuera was working with magnetic fields of the 3rd order, this phrase has been written out of history because its discovery contradicted some of Faraday's experiments.

I have read dozens of times all Figuera's patents and he did not state that in his patents. Unless not in those words. If you want to paraphrase Figuera, do it right. Do not use Figuera to promote you 3rd order magnetic fields theory among us. I do not know if you are right or wrong. Your way of writing is as if you had already got overunity. If so share it with us, but do not use the so common here view of 'I give some cryptic clues and discover for yourself the rest of the game' There are many profets around this site. Sorry for been so unpolite. I love trasparent people. I have been cheated some times with such kind of claims.

About Figuera replicas: If Figuera used the "apparently inefficient" configuration of one conductor between the electromagnets was for some reason. He was no stupid for rejecting to use a whole coil between the inductors. In my opinion Figuera tried to get the minimun distance between both electromagnets. I guess he was not getting the results expected from our current view of induction.

Regards

[ALVARO_CS]

Bajac & Hanon
agree 100%

So many sages who know everything needed of our attention !!!!
They have already accomplished (and showed) full overunity, and their devices are the solution to all the energy needs of the world !!!. . . why don´t we praise their superb achievements ?. . . why are we not on our knees prying for them to enlighten us .

I also wanted to ask, why do you call the full load condition the same as the short circuit condition? The short circuit is a fault condition and the currents produced under it can be tenth or hundredth of times higher than the full load operation. The full load condition is the ampere value that keeps the temperature of the coils within rated values. Under a short circuit condition you can in fact experience great breaking forces. But it does not necessarily mean that over unity under full load cannot be achieved.


I also want to clarify that is not possible to avoid the Lenz's effect. We can only mitigate

My mistake, you are right.

In an intuitive way, I feel that the essence and behavior of permanent magnets and electromagnets is way different.
Do not recall the use of PM´s in any of the Figuera patents (just an aside consideration)

Attached pics of my setup (I wrote: similar) just to check if Lenz is manifesting. And it does.

[bajac]

Thank you very much for sharing your experiments, Alvaro.


I would like to ask you if you can run some testing where you can measure the input and output power at different loads. For example, it would be interesting if you can perform testing for no load voltage, and slowly increase the current let's say to 0.25A, 0.5A, 0.75A, and 1A while keeping track of the input and output. I would like to see if the efficiency of the device changes or stays constant under different loads. What is the gauge of the wire being used?


Do you have a way of measuring the RPM?


Your device does not exactly replicate what I want to do but it is a good experiment.


Thanks again for the information. This is the way we should be working in this forum.


Bajac