Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Doug1]

Figurea uses a clever method to fluctuate the field strengths with his commutator and a number of brushes. The connections to the brushes are most likely the resistance if he used undersize wire. The inducers are standard.
  I chose another way to do the same but used the coil design to do the same thing just because I felt like it and its easier for me to calculate.
  The picture I posted before was for a method to wind a single magnet or inducer.It is a all one length of coil made up of segments which have taps at points where the wire resistance will be reduced due to an apparent shortening of the length of wire as the same current, one source is connected in sequence to the additional taps.
  Aka what makes a stronger magnet? More turns ,more current, better core. 

[ignacio]

Figurea uses a clever method to fluctuate the field strengths with his commutator and a number of brushes. The connections to the brushes are most likely the resistance if he used undersize wire. The inducers are standard.
  I chose another way to do the same but used the coil design to do the same thing just because I felt like it and its easier for me to calculate.
  The picture I posted before was for a method to wind a single magnet or inducer.It is a all one length of coil made up of segments which have taps at points where the wire resistance will be reduced due to an apparent shortening of the length of wire as the same current, one source is connected in sequence to the additional taps.
  Aka what makes a stronger magnet? More turns ,more current, better core.

Doug, si se quiere cambiar el flujo del campo magnético, solo hay que cambiar los cables de un juego de bobinas, el de la derecha se mueve a la izquierda, y viceversa.  El sistema es inmóvil.

Doug, if you want to change the flow of the magnetic field, you just need to change the wires of a set of coils, the right wing is moved to the left, and vice versa. the system is still, or the system it is static.

Mientras que un set de bobinas esta en play y el opuesto esta en apagado.
While a set of coils is in play and the other is on off

Hay un video por Isfex (vimeo.com), que muestra el cachivache de Clemente Figuera, solo hay que conectarlo a los set de bobinas, se ve la onda sinusoidal pura, cuando un terminal esta completo, el otro terminal esta al minimo.

http://cacharreo.com.es/foro/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1059&start=460

There is a video by Isfex (vimeo.com), showing the gizmo Clement Figuera, is pure sine wave, you just have to connect it to the sets of coils, when a terminal is max, the other terminal  is minimum.

[Doug1]

ignacio

As far as I can understand from the web site you pointed to in Spanish. From the drawings and a few words here and there I did not see any design where the opportunity to close the loop would present itself. Moving the field by turning it off and on left and right with the left being made of two sets and the right being made of two sets using normal coil designs should function more like a complex transformer or a magnetic amplifier. I did not see where any advantage could be exploited to provide gain over the input quantity or to exploit an advantage of gain from output to result in having enough to run the load and itself. Granted I don't speak Spanish but as so many have stated before a picture is worth a 1000 words and some words I can figure out.
   I do agree the device does not have moving parts with exception of the controller which is by description a commutator with brushes which works as a series of switches that can be controlled by the speed of a small motor used to turn the sets of brushes around the outside of the commutator. He does'nt even bother to just turn the inside part like you would find on a motor. Do you not find that strange and more likely a difficult method. I would question why a person would use that method over recycling a motor commutator where the brushes are stationary and the commutator turns.
 

[hanon]

Hi all,

Mechanical conmutator, as the one described by Figuera, are difficult to built because rotating the brush will require a great mechanical precision to avoid creating sparks.

I include here two options to get a commutator where brushes are static as in any common motors or generators.

OPTION 1: Suppose that over a rotating axis you install a 14 or 16 contact commutator (recovered from and old motor or generator). Then you install a rotating cylinder where you put the 14 resistor segments around its perimeter. Each 7 resistor you take an connection out to one splip ring. Therefore you will have two slip rings connected each 7 steps achieving the same results as Figuera did. Each slip ring is connected to each row of electromagnets through a brush.

OPTION 2: Installing a rotating axis with a 14 contact commutator connected to 7 slip rings, each one connected to one of the resistor segments as in Figuera patent.

With both of these options you could get a commutator with static brushes. The aim is to build an easier commutator with static brushes to avoid having sparks. Comments?

[Doug1]

There is a reason he did not use a motor comm. Here is a pic of simple version with only 4 brushes and the source is noted in the pic along with page # in the book and pg # in the pdf file. So you can get right to the reading part. You can scour the net for patents of the day which confirm the method during the time period.