Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

ignacio

Hace algún tiempo alguien menciono que querría decir CF, con la (y), y ahora con el rozamiento electromagnético, se me ocurre que con dos (doble T) una bobinada en un sentido y la otra en el otro, se podría aumentar o disminuir el rozamiento, y el N y S seria más efectivo. Solo es una idea.
Creo que con las medidas que di en su día, añadí que se consultara a alguien que trabajara en motores o bobinados.
Perenquen me dice que los estoy liando demasiado, que son demasiados datos sueltos. Disculpen.

Some time someone mentioned that would mean CF, with the (y), and now with the electromagnetic friction occurs to me that two (double T) a coiled in one direction and the other in the other, could increase or decrease ago friction, and the N and S would be more effective. It's just an idea.
I believe that the measures I gave at the time, added that consult someone working on motors or windings.
Canary Island wall gecko tells me that I'm messing too, that are too loose data. Sorry.

AVENGERS

I need all of your help Please. The volts are not moving back and forth across the resister. I noted on the paper what the readings where, hope its not to blurry. Thank You for your help in the past. I didn't burn them & I have the BDX53C transistors hooked up correctly this time. The 555 area has 7 volts and the two 4017BCP's have near 12 volts as well as the 4081B. I didn't install the 10,000uf, 25V Capacitor as Anonymous didn't have it installed on his circuit.
Thanks Again, Hope you all do well.
AVENGERS

hanon

A very important read

GUIDE TO BUCKING COILS,     in hyiq.org.

I think that Figuera also used this principle.

Direct link to pdf file:  http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

Link to webpage:  http://www.hyiq.org/Updates/Update?Name=Update%2030-11-14

I attach here the current version of this document. Please have a look to this info!!

I have looked for synonyms of "buck":  to oppose, resist, combat, go against, withstand, dispute, fight



hanon

Avengers,

I think you are referring in one of your previous post to the circuit included in Patrick Kelly book. I can only recommend you to check step by step each part with an oscilloscope. If not you can not detect if your circuit is fine or if it has a problem in any part (555, CD4017,...). Apart from that, it is imposible to guess which your problem is. I don´t have an oscilloscope and I feel really limited to test any kind of electronic circuit.

From your pictures I have seen you are testing a kind of configuration as the one included in Patrick Kelly book. I recommed you to test a different setup with all coils aligned:  ---- ----  ----