Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[norman6538]

Marathon man I think the drawing #3 should say "flux at 90 degrees"

not 90%.

I didn't think any current was produced moving along the side of a coil.
Am I wrong?

Norman

[marathonman]

I know that it should say 90 degrees, so tell that to my key board that doesn't have a degree sign.
next time i'll put degrees just so you won't get confused.

[marathonman]

Here is something else to to think about.
{Sorry for the mistake about EMF with one pole what was i thinking}

[antijon]

@Norman, you're not wrong. If this were a typical AC transformer, having flux at 90 degrees to a coil would produce no output. However, Marathonman's setup is slightly different than that image. If it does simulate a moving field, it may act similar to a flux-cutting generator.

@Marathonman, I want to remind you, but I'm sure you know. Without Lenz opposition the efficiency of power transferred is going to be lower, so you may want to plan with Ohm's law in mind, V/R=I.

[marathonman]

I agree with V/R=I and i have planned accordingly but i totally disagree with your Lenz statement  as Lenz is the #1 reason Transformers and Generators are inefficient.
have you heard of Gennady Markov,  i have studied his work and his transformers are 100's % more efficient than a regular transformer because he side steps Lenz.
Ohm's Law and Lenz have Nothing to do with one another.
and yes you are correct as to the Flux cutting Generator but in this case if there is any Lenz at all it will be at 90 Degrees to the inducers flux.

below is a pic of Gennady Morkov Transformer.