Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

Saw the video but didn't notice the part where he explains how Lenz is not there.

You put two coils in series on a toroid and it magically has no Lenz problems?

Now that's  funny any way you look at it.
That's exactly why Figueras split up the cores.

Doug1; I to lost many, many years of research on a storage drive. i will have to pay a lot to retrieve it but i need the research material. suck don't it !

when i posted my device the way i had it wired it would of been CW, CCW, CW, CCW ect.... but after looking at the way Figueras had it wired from my post 2632 i have realized that all the output cores are wired CW.  this device can be wired in different ways so this is just for the post 2632 not my previous post.it is still correct.

[marathonman]

And if any one is interested in DipTrace pcb design software  just look at what you can do with the silk screen.
it will be in white but it still looks way cool.
Pic is back of board.

[hanon]

Marathonman,

If you draw an imaginary  line from the center of the pole of one electromagnets to the center of the pole of the other electromagnet you will have determined the axis along which induction is done symmetrically. Let´s say that there is a radial symmetry from this axis . Induction does not know about left, right, up, down from this axis: the same action is done equally in all directions.

In your design if you place the induced coil just in the center then the induction creation to the left side is compensated by the induction to the right side, therefore no net result will be obtained.

The only way that your design had any chance to work is if you place the induced coil de-centered (out from the center) . For example, placing all induced coils to the left of the induction axis, or placing them slight "in front" respect to the axis (let´s say outside the plane of the paper in your sketch) 

[marathonman]

Quote from Figueras Patent; Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion, is that the turns of the induced circuit approaches and moves away from the magnetic centers of the inductor magnet or electromagnets, and those turns,  while spinning, go through sections of the magnetic  field of different power, because, while this has its maximum attraction in the center of the core of each electromagnet.

Well Mr Hanon we have a dilemma, or rather "YOU" do.   see mr Figueras a "Physics Professor" knew that the maximum force from an electromagnet will be when it was centered and even stated this FACT in his PATENT.  so it seems that you know more than a Physics Professor. not only that you contradicted yourself from your first paragraph to your last paragraph.
SO like i said "YOU" have a dilemma not me.

and while your at it tell all the Inventors of ring Dynamo's that their making them wrong and that the won't work. you know the one with the electromagnet at 90 degrees to the coil.

[antijon]

hanon, now that you mention it, it appears only the outer most coils will be producing current. However, if the complete set was separated into groups that problem could be avoided. Such as 4 groups, each containing 2 output coils with their exciters.

But in light of this, it doesn't seem likely that this is Figueras design. If this is arranged in a straight line, matching the latest Buforn patent, little to no output should be induced.

Lenz law is simply a prediction of the direction of current and magnetic fields produced by induction. http://www.vias.org/matsch_capmag/wrapnt5A50E8_inductance___electromagnetic_br_energy_conversion.html This is a good site to learn about induction.

The ring dynamo did have less back-torque. This doesn't mean that it avoided Lenz law, it means that it had very poor induction. At high outputs, efficiency drops to nill. To counter this exciter current would need to be increased, but because of the low induction, saturation would soon follow. Basically, you'd need a ring dynamo the size of Manhattan just to power the city of Manhattan.