Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

NRamaswami;

well em, i was kind of being derogatory. sorry !
Is pot or Hallucinogen legal in your country? it must be.

happy Figuering and Happy Holidays.

PS. Hanon you are ok in my book.

[NRamaswami]

Marathonman..No problem..I'm a teetotaler vegetarian and conservative and peaceful Hindu who respects all religions and all faiths and go to Churches, Mosques and Temples all to pray. There are families where one is hindu and one is christian and Tamil Muslims are very peaceful people and had converted to Islam on their own more than 1000 years back.

I do not smoke, do not drink alchohol and do not eat meat. So No Hallucinations.

I would humbly request you to replicate the experiments that I did. It will take another 12 to 15000 dollars for this to be done and we are in recession and from a staff strength of 19 people I'm down to just four. I cannot invest more in this and I have disclosed all.

Why do not you do the experiment as described by me for a start and verify yourself. There are people who have verified part of the device and found my description to match. But they are not willing to come forward for they are afraid.

I started with humble beginnings and came to Madras with just Rs.750 Rupees and a degree in Law and struggled enormously. I know the pain of loss of employment for many families for lack of power. So I asked what is the status of research only to find that my rich clients owning wind turbine mills have no idea on technology. No research and funding and so I spent my own money and produced some results and some friends then came forward to support me and this is how I have done these things. I have tried technical advice and they are wrong. So I used observation and then followed Figuera and applied commonsense and the result came.

I suggest that you take a large solenoid and put 14 filar coils of 4 sq mm wire that can transport 24 amps to 27 amps electricity at 220 volts and give the power to it just as a single primary..See what is the output at the end of the primary.. See what is the input consumed. See what is the magnetic field strength developed. That single experiment has been replicated by some one here and he confirmed that I'm 1000% accurate.

With due respect and in all my humility you please accept this single experiment as a challenge. A single electromagnet. 18 inch long and 4 to 6 inches dia and fill it iron rods and then wind over it a 14 filar 4 sq mm wire. Give 220 volt AC input. see what is the input amperage that goes in and see what is the output that comes out of the solenoid. See what is the magnetic field strength. you would instantly know what I'm saying.

Though I'm a patent attorney I have elected not to file any patents and put it in open source and so no one can get any patent and cannot harass people who want to build these devices and sell them. As for me, I'm physically very weak and instead of being greedy and thinking about millions of dollars let me put in my small part so humanity can benefit out of this knowlege given to me.

See I'm a Lawyer. No training in this domain and i'm able to do this. How and why? I also ended up spending a lot of money Why..Some invisible force has forced me to do this and made me disclose this..

This is a humble challenge. Please accept it. Do the experiment and verify the results yourself and if you have doubts ask me and I will happily guide you. I do not deceive people on principle.

No hallucination.

People are ridiculed..

People are opposed

People are then accepted is the rule for inventors. Here I'm not the Inventor. The inventor is Figuera and Buforn. I have added an earth connection. I could have applied for a patent and then I would have come under threats to sell the patent and it would have gone to dust. But I sacrificed this aspect of greed and has disclosed so it can be done in hundreds of places and verified.


If the device of solenoid as described does not produce high magnetic field for a low input electrical field you can come here and you can beat me like a child as you stated in your earlier posts. I'm just joking and not offended by that and Please do not take any offence. The device works. period. Test it and without that please do not think for a moment I'm making false claims. I do not do that.

Regards,

Ramaswami

[marathonman]

I would not humbly replicate your stupidity to save my life, i would rather Die. i sure hope you are a better Lawyer then you are an experimenter because you suck at it.
your advice is like catching the clap from a  Hooker that's giving away free cuchie. you knew it was bad before you hit it. thanks but NO THANKS !
Sorry but i am more intelligent then a box of rocks at a nut concert.
if you along with every other nut that comes on this website that run's their mouth would actually read the F-in Patents that Clemente Figueras gave to the world you will find that there is another side to the Lorenz force that man has not postulated.
Figueras knew this but was cryptic about his presentation to the bankers because he did not want them to get a hold of his crown jewel. the stationary Dynamo.....1908 Patent. this he gave to the world but they tried to hide it until two people gave a darn..... and you two know who you are. thank you ! you have changed the world whether you know it or not.
Figueras gave this to us to use but some of you are to darn ignorant to even fathom the Simplex design of it all so i beg of you to read the Patent....all of them 20 times like i and many others have and realize the end result is more simple than you think.

i had help in my journey to him i will forever be grateful. those hints were well received and i thank you.

this device given to us by Clemente Figueras of the Canary Islands is a Variable Inductance Cascade Amplifier. it Amplifies the incoming signal by using two opposing Magnetic poles being varied by the commutator in a push pull fashion. while one is gaining the other is receding  buy while it is receding and on the opposite side of the core it aides the gaining electromagnet as the currant is of the same direction. B fields cancel E fields add so you are getting a two for one deal as to say just as Floyd sweet so elegantly presented many years later and who knows he might of copied Figueras.
if it was of opposite polarity it would act as ONE MAGNET so stop asking or posting this stupidity.

he used all N electromagnets or S Electromagnets as if the one next to it was of opposite polarity it would siphon the flux straight away and leave the core virtually empty .....ie SQUAT OUTPUT.
so what did we learn from this post... well,
1. that i am aggravated beyond comprehension at all you BONE heads for not reading the F-in Patents.
2. we have a DC device using two opposite and opposing Electromagnets being varied in intensity (ie Currant) to Amplify the incoming signal inducing  currant into the Secondary then cascaded to get the desired voltage. once the level of flux is attained in the core it requires little amperage to maintain.

Thus ends Variable inductance cascade Amplifier 101, 102,  and advanced class 105
all D and F students will be redirected to PJK BOOK PDF 101.

Happy Holidays and Happy Figuering.

[Doug1]

Lenz's law /ˈlɛnts/ is a common way of understanding how electromagnetic circuits obey Newton's third law and the conservation of energy. Lenz's law is named after Heinrich Lenz, and it says: If an induced current flows, its direction is always such that it will oppose the change which produced it.

Formally stated, Newton's third law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object.

  Was having a thought about this since it keeps getting thrown around. Wrongly applied to a different set of conditions even an internal combustion engine would be up for argument. Just exclude the fact that the detonation is confined to only allow the piston to travel without blowing the heads of the engine. Exclude the piston acting on a crankshaft in a circular motion to contain the travel of the piston so it does not fly out of the bottom of the cylinder. You could argue all day long for eternity just apply unconfined singular straight line effects to something which is not. Lenz law implies there is something being acted on which has a resistance to that action. Certainly you could imagine that a increase in load will require an increase in force to move that load.Resistance to that change could never go away except for it to never happen. Since it is going to happen instead of trying to say it is mitigated and does not exist why not think of it as being part of the back board used to constrain the force being used to move the object. Like the way the cylinder heads confine the combustion so the piston can only travel inside a confined space. Lenz law does not have to be broken just controlled.

[norman6538]

Formally stated, Newton's third law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object.

  Was having a thought about this since it keeps getting thrown around. Wrongly applied to a different set of conditions even an internal combustion engine would be up for argument.

The cylinder is counter balanced with a crankshaft weight so it does not get yanked apart. Its like if you were on a skateboard and you pushed another person on a skate board with wheels in the same direction both of you would move backwards but
if you turned one skate board 90 degrees the wheels would prevent that equal
and opposite movement.

Norman