Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

nul-points


Quote; marathonman:  Reply #3032 on: January 26, 2016    ""cks,   i have a two section unit that has produced overunity   but ill be G ""

Les deux ballons d'air chaude?
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

NoyPi

seaad, I think that's not going to happen, almost a full disclosure? think again. If I remember, RomeroUK was
the one who almost gave it. But for some reason he change his mind.
I'll be happy if someone could show a video of his working device, a close loop probably, just like everyone else, who done it. And to inspire someone just like me to build this device.


NRamaswami

I'm increasingly concerned that in this thread the attitude is becoming if you do not agree with what we say or report any thing to the contrary even if they are factual observations you are not with us.

I believe that the only commutator that was ever displayed in this thread is the commutator video shown by me. At that time Doug1 asked why redo the same device? That is what prompted me along with my failure in building the proper commutator to try with device that will avoid the commutator totally.

Figuera patent shows three modules Two modules of Primary magnets having primaries connected in parallel. Within each of these modules themselves the primary electromagnets are connected in series. The secondary is the middle module of many electromagnets connected in series.

It took time for me to recognize that if all the electromagnets are connected in parallel then the effect on secondary would be an amplifying effect. This happens when we use the NS-NS-NS polarties. The Primaries are here equal and opposite in power.

The other thought process holds that the electromagnets should be powered up and down and one of them should be weaker than the other always and this thought process holds that it is necessary to use only identical poles. Here the two opposing electromagnets are never equal but always oppose each other. Opposition is through identical but strong and weak poles. MM insists that to test this set up the commutator is needed. Unfortunately I'm not successful there. Since I have found an alternative and working method and since the poles are not disclosed in the Figuera patent admittedly I have used only opposite poles.

I have interpreted that they will vary in intensity always to mean that the movement of electricity is first like ------>S<-------- and then like
<--------S--------->. There is a continuous variation.

I have to concede that while it meets party the Figuera concept because there is no commutator that it is not a true Figuera Replication.

When the secondary is induced by many primary coils connected in parallel, the inducing primary does not suffer from voltage drop and consequently the induced emf of the secondary is higher. As a result the amperage of the secondary is also higher if the secondary is a thick wire with low resistance or low impedance. Secondly the asymmetric transformer core design where the primaries compress their magnetic field on a smaller secondary to make it more powerful seems to be more important to me than the commutator requirement.

Unfotunately very capable people have refused to give me any assistance on how I can connect the feedback coil to the exciting coil  Do I need two capacitors fast charging and discharing in series or one? Will I have phase matching problems if I use a single capacitor? Do I need to use slow charging and discharging capacitors two or one in number in parallel. Do I need to use a neon lamp which works at 220 volts to be added as spark gap to prevent fire hazard? Do I need to use the secondary which is in phase with the exciting coil and the feedback coil to be connected to the exciting coil so that that the vibration is always maintained?

But unfortunately I'm not a technical person. So I have moved out of the Figuera device just to avoid this controversy00000 and built the Hubbard modified device which I have experimented with. I have built 80% of the device as known to me. But without the answers to the above questions I will not be able to proceed. I selected the Hubbard to build but the principle of multiple primaries in parallel inducing a single series connected secondary is also applied here. That alone can show a COP>1 output. Just check it with 24 parallel primaries exciting a single secondary coil of adequate turns and thickness at high frequency and high voltage and see what is the input and output. A large single solenoid on which thin primaries and thick secondaries are wound one surrounding the other00000 is sufficient to tell you the resulting output vs input values. All primaries and secondary rotate current in the same direction though the alternating primaries can be started from top and bottom of the solenoid. It is wire on wire induction or flux linking but it also works. It is a simple small device that can be built to test the principle.

Figuera has limited the parallel primaries to just two only to ensure that he would cover more than two parallel primaries also.

I felt that the principle is more important than the exact replication due to my admitted incompetence in building the rotary device. But strangely that remains the only rotary device shown here in a video so far.

Those who guided me earlier refuse to even respond to my mails. Do not know why. If some one in the forum can answer how the feedback coil should be connected to the exciting coil please do let me know. I will try it any way on my own in April end and will post results.

Regards,

Ramaswami------



marathonman

 I don't understand why everyone is so worried about everyone else research except their own non existent research.
if you have even close the hours i have been putting in on the Figuera device then you would know what time it is.

i have reread all of the energetic forum post's and printed the important ones, i have reread all the overunity post's and printed all of those that matter. i have downloaded all the patent's and all others pertaining to electromagnetism and the like rereading at least 30 times each. not only that i have listened to and studied some very profound post's from Doug and others...... all of this amounts to hundreds of hours of research.

The figuers Device is Two opposing electromagnets with a secondary in between. the primary electromagnets are wound with VERY low ohm high amperage wire or thick foil.
the system is using High voltage DC ran through a continuously rotating Variac or Rheostat wound with high amperage wire being driven by a small DC motor. the Rheostat has very low resistance because of the thick wire used with only two outputs and one input that is the rotating brush input. as the brush rotates the currant enters into the winding's and causes an magnetic field in the core of the Rheostat or Varidc if you prefer. the field in the core causes reluctance (resistance to currant flow) and as the brush rotates and gets closer to the Set N output the reluctance gets smaller because their are less winding's so that lets more currant flow and less currant to flow to Set S because of more winding's  (Reluctance). as the brush leaves Set N and approaches Set S the reluctance to Set N is increased and decreased to Set S allowing more currant to flow to Set S and less to Set N thus varying the currant to Set N and S continuously without Resistors just using a magnetic field of the core (Reluctance)

as Set N primaries increase Set S is decreasing but Set N shoves Set S out of the secondary core the fields from Set S is shoved back into the system to be stored by part G Rheostat or varidc in the form of a magnetic field in the core of part G. when the system needs to replace losses from heat or wire loss in can use the stored magnetic field in part G to replace these losses which are very small. this allows the Figuera device to be self sustaining or self running if you will.
thus the Part G of the figuera device has multiple rolls.
1.  to create frequency from DC source.
2. to split the currant between primaries.
3. to store the energy kicked back into the system from the declining electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary core. the part G has a core that stores energy in the form of magnetic field that allows it to be self running replacing the losses from heat and wire losses which are small because the currant in the primaries are always the same direction.
4. Self regulation through reluctance.

the two opposing electromagnets are NN in this device. they are not NS because the attraction between NS will be way to strong for ANY variation of magnetic field between them, basically making ONE LARGE MAGNET.
with them being NN the two magnetic fields occupying the same relative space of the secondary will have the same magnetic fields as one very large field in regular generators all while feeding itself through the declining electromagnet.