Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[wistiti]

Thank you Hannon for sharing your experiment!
My next test for the "g" part will be on a laminate steel toroid. I will wind it with 10 awg copper wire in 2 part 180° like in the pjkbook.
Ciao!

[hanon]

Reading about Daniel McFarland Cook patent ( patent number US119825 ) I found this post which I think it is quite useful for those who want to read "between lines" and see some underlining principle:


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1616.msg27550#msg27550


Daniel McFarland Cook invented an "electro-magnetic battery" as he called. Some people suggest that his coils were storing energy, as a battery or as a Leedskalnin´s perpetual motion holder (PMH). I guess that while one coil is getting filled up the other coil is emptying and its energy is then used for the coil which is getting filled up, maybe creating some kind of phase shift between them. I can see in that patent some similiarities to Clemente Figuera idea of two fields powered up and down in opposition. But this is just my guess.


Other people see in this patent some kind of mutual interaction between both coils. Also a likely option.


Cook: " My invention relates to the combination of two or more simple or compound helices and iron cores or magnets in such a manner as to produce a constant electric current without the aid of a galvanic battery."


What about if Cook placed his coils aligned (one after the other) instead that in parallel?

[forest]

Good catch hanon. It's all connected.Alfred Hubbard took design and added more coils ....
And so on...


Consider your test with variac. If the frequency of turning is fast enough what would be the result ?If you replace bulbs with a transformer would it stopped induction if frequency is high enough ? Isn't that like permanent magnet then ?

[wistiti]

Work in progres...

[Sam6]

Attached is an updated spreadsheet for designing a Figuera device to replace the one I posted earlier. That one had some errors in the formulas for calculating lines required to generate a voltage and in automatically selecting the maximum side of a coil from a list.

In playing with the numbers I found that for a 16 KW unit, there appears to be an optimal oversizing factor for the inducer coils. 5000 ampere turns produces 500 lb device with high losses; 10000 amp-turns produces produces a smaller device with reduced losses; a 15000 value produces a heavier machine with even fewer losses. There seems to be a sweet spot somewhere around 10000 amp turns.

I also played with removing one of the output coils. The output was significantly reduced of course, but the losses were disproportionately high because three of the original four coil/core elements were still in use. There is a significant penalty for removing the second output coil - even if there were no joints to consider.

mm
I found your PM. Thanks
The B values selected in the example are at the knee of the BH curve for soft iron plates to give good regulation. You are right. Increasing B beyond that point requires too many ampere-turns to get a commensurate increase in performance without having a significant core size increase.
Sam