Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[lancaIV]

http://www.rexresearch.com/figuera/figuera.htm
44267
The principle where is based this theory, carries the unavoidable need for the movement of the induced circuit or the inductor circuit, and therefore these machines are taken as transformer of mechanical work into electricity.
               ----------------------------------------------------------------------
"transformer" has been for Buforn/Figuera the used expression for "Converter" and not the today
common used meaning to differ between rotatoric motor/generator and static/no mechanical move
"transformer" !

But this is the translated version,original language version ?
(will become later compared ,if possible)
             -----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was considered the possibility of building a machine that would work, not in the principle of movement, as do the current dynamos, but using the principle of increase and decrease, this is the variation of the power of the magnetic field, or the electrical current which produces it.

~ 30375  from their experience knowledge

target:
The voltage from the total current of the current dynamos is the sum of partial induced currents born in each one of the turns of the induced. Therefore it matters little to these induced currents if they were obtained by the turning of the induced, or by the variation of the magnetic flux that runs through them; but in the first case, a greater source of mechanical work than obtained electricity is required, and in the second case, the force necessary to achieve the variation of flux is so insignificant that it can be derived without any inconvenience, from the one supplied by the machine.

concept principle:
This principle is not new since it is just a consequence of the laws of induction stated by Faraday in the year 1831: what it is new and requested to privilege is the application of this principle to a machine which produces large industrial electrical currents which until now cannot be obtained but transforming mechanical work into electricity.

                                                       
       DESCRIPTION OF GENERATOR OF VARIABLE EXCITATION "FIGUERA"

                  cylinder "G" powered by the action of a small electrical motor.
                (cadman,for me the infamous "part G"defines the G-enerator)
                +  the excitatory current which is taken from an external and foreigner generator.       (alternatively :batteryset)

As seen in the drawing the current, once that has made its function, returns to the generator where taken; naturally in every revolution of the brush will be a change of sign in the induced current; but a switch will do it continuous if wanted.  From this current is derived a small part to excite the machine converting it in self-exciting and to operate the small motor which moves the brush and the switch; the external current supply, this is the feeding current, is removed and the machine continue working without any help indefinitely.

                          feedback circuit ,dynamo principle(Siemens)

                                                     conclusion 44267
     
The machine is essentially characterized by two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit, between whose poles the reels of the induced are properly placed. Both circuits, remaining motionless, induced and inductor, are able to produce a current induced by the constant variation of the intensity of the magnetic field forcing the excitatory current (coming at first from any external source) to pass through a rotating brush which, in its rotation movement, is placed in communication with the commutator bars or contacts of a ring distributor or cylinder whose contacts are in communication with a resistance whose value varies  from a maximum to a minimum and vice versa, according with the commutator bars of the cylinder which operates, and for that reason the resistance is connected to the electromagnets N by one of its side, and the electromagnets S at the other side, in such a way that the excitatory current will be magnetizing successively with more or less strength to the first electromagnets, while, oppositely, will be decreasing or increasing the magnetization  in the second ones, determining these variations in intensity of the magnetic field, the production of the current in the induced, current that we can use for any work for the most part, and of which only one small fraction is derived for the actuation of a small electrical motor which make rotate the brush, and another fraction goes to the continuous excitation of the electromagnets, and, therefore, converting the machine in self-exciting, being able to suppress the external power which was used at first to excite  the electromagnets. Once the machinery is in motion, no new force is required and the machine will continue in operation indefinitely.

           Today we know such a machine concept by the name : Rotoverter !
            I think somebody thought this had been a: Transverter !
            http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/files/Trans-verter%20R%20and%20D.pdf
           errare humanum est
     
          [ I please you really moderatly for "pardon me?",marathonman,cause indirectly off-thread   
           Transverter/ static dynamo ? : let us go (virtual) to (L)A Corun(h)a,Northwest-Spain:
           https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=4&date=20070201&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP
           automatic description translation:
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=ES&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=2265253&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.1&SRCLANG=es&TRGLANG=en   

           "Definitive Protection" 2008,approvement from paper values ?
           or by functional prototype testing and result acceptance ?!
           energy source : a costa de la degradación de los imanes permanentes

           http://www.buscar-abogados.com/abogado/maria-isabel-esteban-perez-serrano/
          advocare : advogado/abogado: lawyer ]
         
          marathonman,it is not easy to stay in angelii manner,my satanii part "juckt kraeftig"

           Sometimes it is dangerous to believe in "transforming"-books and descriptions/publications:
           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6D1YI-41ao
           

[Doug1]

NRamaswami

  I dont like addressing you because your name is too hard to remember how to spell. Pick a short nick name something easy something you approve.

   (Lenz's law states that the current induced in a circuit due to a change or a motion in a magnetic field is so directed as to oppose the change in flux and to exert a mechanical force opposing the motion.)

    Where does this state how the magnetic field was created that was used for the observation? The observation is regarding what? The focus of the observation is on what part? The definition of work is what? Break it down, what where when. Keep the answers short simple direct.

[NRamaswami]

Doug

You may please call me Rams if it is easy to use.

I have to decline to accept the bait. In theoretical knowledge you are a Tiger and I am a cat. Not fair game here.

I only shared my experiments and observations.

lancaIV..sir..the one more observation that I need to share is that increasing the primary voltage dramatically increases the secondary wattage. You can reduce the primary amperage by using multifilar coils with plastic iron sheet plastic placed between layers of primary multifilar wire. Magnetism is intense. Input is AC. Cause is increasing inductive impedance in primary.  I can only experiment once in a month now and if I have reportable results I will share.

My coils are fairly large. They are heavy.  It takes time and effort to winfmd them and experiment. 

Marathonman.. here is a deal you cannot refuse.  You tender an unconditional apology to all including Mr. Dare Diamond and I will not post here in this thread. You know I am honest. 

Regards

Ramaswami

[Doug1]

 If you drop a rock is it theory it will fall to the ground? Im sure there was time when the result was theoretical.

[lancaIV]

Ramaswami,
what is written and explained will not become forgotten !
But we have at first concentrate our workpotential in one direction !

As "Figuera thread" the Figuera-details has all to become clear and understandable !

100V/1 Ampére in                           and                              550 V/300 Ampére out
                                               (hypo-)thesis
small motor                                                                                     G-enerator

                I will use the Mukherjee generator/controle unit  F1/F2 relationship:
                a.first objective difference Mukherjee is not a pulsed "generator" device
                   pulsed systems have got extra  power saving effect potential (duty cycle !)

                                                        Figuera device     
                                                      550/   100 V tension     
                                                      300/       1 A current
   
               the tension drop = 5,5 times would give 300/(5,5x5,5) A current as VA input need
               let us roughly give 100V á "10"A = 1000VA what differs from the written 100 VA

                                     really sad,this difference ! unexplainable ?

                                                     Mukherjee device link II :
                                        the above relationship F1/F2 has been by
                2x magnetic field force relationship between generator/controle unit

                                        recitating from the publication:
              Bei dem erfindungsgemässen Generator, bei welchem die Permeabilität des Generatorfeldkerns 10,000 und die der elektrischen Einrichtung 100 000 beträgt, ist die Feldstärke der elektrischen Einrichtung um das 10-Fache grösser als die des Generators. Wenn die Spulenlänge in beiden Ankern gleich gehalten wird, wird 1/10 des Generatorstroms in der elektrischen Einrichtung verbraucht, um die Gegenkraft auf der Welle zu kompensieren, d.h. BLI = 1OB  x L x 1/10. 

Somit wird 1/100 oder 1% der Generatorenergie von der elektrischen Einrichtung verbraucht.

                  for someones better understanding,google translated:

The inventive generator in which the permeability of the generator field core 10,000 and the electrical device is 100 000, the field strength of the electrical device to 10 times greater than that of the generator. If the coil length is kept the same in both anchors, 1/10 of the generator current is consumed in the electrical device in order to compensate the reaction force on the shaft, i.e. BLI = 1Ob x L x 1/10.

  Thus, 1/100 or 1% of the generator energy is consumed by the electric device.

                            a 10 to 1 generator/controle unit magnetic force field relationship gives :

                       (550VX 300A) / 100 = 165 VA    one step-by-the-other

                                          enough C.O.P. ? No

                             Mukherjee link III,conductor length related :

Wenn bei dem erfindungsgemässen Generator die Spulenlänge des Ankers der elektrischen Einrichtung 1/5 von der des Generatorankers beträgt und der Durchmesser ihrer Anker gleich gehalten wird, wird die Hälfte des Generatorstroms in der elektrischen Einrichtung verbraucht, da BLI = 1OB x L/5 x 1  Dies bedeutet, dass 1/4 oder 25% der Generatorenergie in der elektrischen Einrichtung verbraucht werden. Zieht man den anderen Verbrauch von 5 bis 7%, wie vorstehend erläutert, in Betracht, so ergibt sich ein Verlust von 30 bis 32%. Man erhält also 68 bis 70% der vom Generator abgegebenen Energie auf Kosten von 30 bis 32% Abgabeenergie und ohne dass eine andere externe Energie verbraucht wird.Zur Erzeugung von soviel Energie mit einem herkömmlichen Generator mit einem Wirkungsgrad von 80% müssen das 5/4-Fache oder 125% dieser Energie kontinuierlich zugeführt werden.

                               ito dito:
If in the inventive generator, the coil length of the armature of the electrical device 1/5 that of the generator armature and the diameter of its armature is held equal to one half of the generator current is consumed in the electric device, since BLI = 1Ob x L / 5 x 1 This means that 1/4 or 25% of the generator energy is consumed in the electrical device. Subtracting the other consumption of 5 to 7%, as explained above, into consideration, the result is a loss of 30 or 32%. So 68 to 70% of the votes from the generator power is obtained at the cost of 30 or 32% output power and with no other external energy consumed enthrall generating as much energy with a conventional generator with an efficiency of 80% to the 5/4 -fold or 125% of this energy can be supplied continuously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (magnetic force field x conductor length)/(magnetic force field x conductor length)

                         balance of power
                         balancing the power