Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

Doug;

You already know if it is not written in crayola crayon he won't understand it.

Quote;
"My interest is not going into any dispute, believe me. I just stated in EF that the toroid was not mandatory because it was not described explicitly in the patent."

explicitly means at the comprehension level of a fifth grader and written in crayola crayon. this device is way beyond his level and is a complete waste of your breath. it is written in the patent your just to ignorant to put it together.

we all know hanon can't comprehend long words or any abstract out of the box thinking so why waste your time. it is like trying to teach a turtle to run....... WHY ?

Quote;
"I think your arguing for arguments sake."

entirely correct as his track record can attest to that.


MM 

[hanon]

Doug;

You already know if it is not written in crayola crayon he won't understand it.

Quote;
"My interest is not going into any dispute, believe me. I just stated in EF that the toroid was not mandatory because it was not described explicitly in the patent."

explicitly means at the comprehension level of a fifth grader and written in crayola crayon. this device is way beyond his level and is a complete waste of your breath. it is written in the patent your just to ignorant to put it together.

we all know hanon can't comprehend long words or any abstract out of the box thinking so why waste your time. it is like trying to teach a turtle to run....... WHY ?

Quote;
"I think your arguing for arguments sake."

entirely correct as his track record can attest to that.


MM

Each time you insult me I will go to the thread started by you in EF to show some facts.


See you later there!


You should be very grateful to Doug because he taught all you know about Figuera . If not you would be still an ignorant guy. Sadly he can not fix your unbalanced brain. I feel sorry for you. Really.

[seaad]

Hanon, don't be sad / mad , look forward!  We (all) will soon witness how one of the globe's most expensive and most complicated home-built shortcut circuit from MM will perform. I'm sure you are going to smile again.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/20619-figuera-device-part-g-continuum-serious-builders-only-4.html

[allcanadian]

@Doug1

you can re-examine G and the few parts it is made up of. As the field from N or S retards power is sent back into G at which time you have to start looking at it from the point of view of an amplifier. Where now you have two sources of input which if combined at the right time increase the output of G to the next increasing inducer. If the core becomes over saturated by ether input its dead. Since the goal is to be self sustained plowing it full of current from ether source from the start is counter productive since as a generator it will produce power over time enough to operate itself and do work.

You seem to believe the inductive discharge from the inducers is sent back to G at which point the input may be added to the energy in translation not unlike many resonant self-oscillating circuits. Fair enough however I fail to see a "mechanism for gain" in this theory as energy is being taken from the system in the induced coils. Not unlike many resonant self-oscillating systems the input can be very small however once a load is applied to the system the load always reflects back to the source. Can you explain why that would not happen in this case?.

I have come to believe one of two things must happen, 1)Energy is not dissipated in the output section as expected for some reason or 2)a mechanism for gain within the system compensates for the energy dissipated in the output for some reason. In either case there should be a valid reason as to why the output does not effect the input as we would normally expect.

AC

[Doug1]

@Doug1
You seem to believe the inductive discharge from the inducers is sent back to G at which point the input may be added to the energy in translation not unlike many resonant self-oscillating circuits. Fair enough however I fail to see a "mechanism for gain" in this theory as energy is being taken from the system in the induced coils. Not unlike many resonant self-oscillating systems the input can be very small however once a load is applied to the system the load always reflects back to the source. Can you explain why that would not happen in this case?.

I have come to believe one of two things must happen, 1)Energy is not dissipated in the output section as expected for some reason or 2)a mechanism for gain within the system compensates for the energy dissipated in the output for some reason. In either case there should be a valid reason as to why the output does not effect the input as we would normally expect.

AC

Maybe the two possibilities are co dependent. I can assure you energy is not dissipated from the moving field "through" the static windings of the stator section. Other wise it would be a transformer based off of mutual induction. ps i would not use the word discharge because it has been overly abused and it's meaning is diluted which will lead to further confusion and sideways insanity bring about talk of quantum relations and the speed at which Uranus is traveling compared to the universal expansion which caused a static discharge to fly out a fly's ass as he was southward bound in flight across the equator. Nah it's best to keep it as simple as possible. When you use two big words that can have many different meanings too close together shit goes very wrong.