Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

That is the whole reason for using thicker wire on part G is not only is it going to be the power supply once the starting is removed but that it will equate to less ohmic losses. it makes sense once you realize that the reverse magnetic field controls the current flow in the system NOT resistance like other electrical systems. thicker wire equates to the most efficient Inductor possible thus allowing the transfer from the magnetic stored field to the electric flow with the least losses as possible.

sense part G's reverse magnetic field controls the current flow why would one wind the primaries with lots of ohms .???  sounds counter productive to me and adds up to more losses. winding the primaries with as little resistance as possible will allow the primaries to react darn near instantly to the current change in part G thus maintaining the needed pressure between the primaries with precision. this is not according to present day teaching that says resistance controls current flow. the reverse magnetic field controls the current flow throughout the system so wind your electromagnets specifically as electromagnets.

the secondary on the other hand IS wound according to present day teachings just like a standard generator output is so wind them accordingly.
always remember part G controls the current flow NOT the primaries.
Regards,
Marathonman

marathonman

Inductance is the key factor in this device and not resistance so concentrate on INDUCTANCE alone and the ratio of inductance between the primaries and Part G, each half separately.
Another thing i would like to bring up again is there has to be a load on the output for the device to work. here is the reason why. when a load is attached to the device and current begins to flow an opposing field to the first in the secondary is formed and it is this field that is pushed from side to side across the electric field formed by the primaries. if no load is present then current will not flow and the opposing field in the secondary will be absent thus no output. the opposing field in the secondaries is what the primaries push from side to side giving the appearance or the illusion of motion in the secondary to the electric field.
no load, no opposing field, no output, it's just that simple.
a load has to be present even when taking readings.
i hope you can understand what was just said.

NO LOAD NO OUTPUT.
Regards,
Marathonman

marathonman

Quote from another forun;
"Glad to see someone using their brain for a change.
Yes, if you want maximum field strength, then the 2 inductors should be pulsed in unison with both at the same amperage levels.
Of course the poles should be set to N-S .
That way, one side of induced coil will be induced with a positive voltage while the other side gets induced with a negative voltage just like in a regular generator."

Absolutely WRONG ! i have already proved with Physics why the primaries are NN in configuration and have a video on youtube as why it is so.
When a magnet is brought into a coil it's current will be in one direction but when you retract the magnet it will reverse current. so do the math folks and not have your head stuck in the sand for six long years.
when two opposing electromagnets are switched like Figuera did one up and the other down, the electric fields will be in the same direction which are additive to match that of a high intensity field of the N S of a standard generator .
I see reality took a side check on EF like crazy thus the blind leading the blind
UFOP still seams to have some sense about him.
the rest, stupid is stupid does. do not listen but to your own bench work as i do. if you do not have the proper pressure between your electromagnet or a load is not present you will get  crap for output.  the thought of you thinking the electromagnets are N S is laughable at best and will result in you wasting your money and time thus resulting in failure.

Regards,
Marathonman

marathonman

The main reason for people thinking they can take side steps in using electronics to power the Figuera device is the fact we have been hypnotized by Corporate world into thinking we really need their BS when in fact we can be without.
using present day electronics in the Figuera device is the reason why most are failing to get an output and blaming it on the NN fields when in fact it is their own stupidity and misunderstanding of the device and events that are taking place in the device.
each side of the device is  or has to be in complete unison one rising the other falling in current. blame the NN fields all you want but it is your IGNORANCE that is blocking you from an output plain and simple.
also the use of electronic is blocking the recycling of the energies in the system and i am sorry your ignorance is stopping you from seeing this.
The Figuera device uses INDUCTANCE device to curtail the current on an orderly fashion and uses the storing and releasing of that energies to it's advantage.
thus the point of this post, you are destin for failure until you realize the very factual statements i have just made and i an sorry to be the barer of bad news but you uninformed on EF or any where for that matter are the ones loosing out from the lack of knowledge of the Figuera device.
The lack of bench work is your demise not mine.
The Figuera device is in FACT NN fields and proven by PHYSICS in my youtube video.
Edit;
I stand corrected, UFOP seems to think the Figuera device is NS and maybe in the land of OZZ but sorry to be the bearer of bad news but you are also INCORRECT in the FIGUERA device.
Blind leading the blind.

regards,
Marathonman

marathonman

  When i an referring to the secondary second field i am referring to the reactive field (The Lenz Law) that opposes the first. when the primaries polarize the secondaries and current begins to flow (With a load) the lenz law kicks in and creates an opposing field to the original polarization. it is this reactive field that is pushed from side to side in a sweeping action across the Electric fields created by the primaries. if there is no load attached to the secondary output there will be no reactive field to push from side to side thus no output will occur.
it is this very action that gives the secondaries the appearance or the illusion of motion to the electric field.

The higher the pressure between the primaries the higher the output from the secondary which is why most are failing to get an output. not enough pressure between the primaries or not switching in unison will cause the lack of output. part G as an active INDUCTOR does just that, raises and lowers the current to the primaries in complete unison.
this is why part G the INDUCTOR is so important in the system as the primaries will ALWAYS remain in complete unison as one loop is subtracted from one side it is added to the other side as the brush rotates. N><N opposing fields at the brush keep each side of the inductor completely separate but always in complete unison.

as i have proved and posted a you tube video that the primaries are in fact NN NOT NS. when using NS and switching like Figuera does with the INDUCTOR the electric field created by the primaries will be opposing thus reducing the output to a bare minimum.  with the primaries in NN with one reducing and the other increasing the Electric fields created will be in the same direction thus being positive and additive.
facts are fact and backed by Physics all day long.
Regards,
Marathonman