Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

The reason i did not post a wiring diagram is because of the two scenarios and i will not find out which one is correct until i build it.
the plus sign is connected to the brush and the negative is connected to the negative of the primaries, follow me so far. i then ran the secondary loop back through a commutator  to the positive brush which being commutated will always stay positive and the other to a negative brush on the opposite side of the positive brush. when it rotates and comes to the position you are referring the secondary will have no power in it as it will be at the zero volt line. plus as i have said the commutator has a non connected pole at those position as a safety precaution. there will be no direct short of any kind because the secondary IS AT ZERO....Got it. NO POWER NO SHORT. if you still do not understand me that i can't help you with just like when Cifta did not understand part G for 5 or 6 long years.
Regards,
Marathonman

[seaad]

The reason i did not post a wiring diagram is because of the two scenarios and i will not find out which one is correct until i build it.
the plus sign is connected to the brush and the negative is connected to the negative of the primaries, follow me so far. i then ran the secondary loop back through a commutator  to the positive brush which being commutated will always stay positive and the other to a negative brush on the opposite side of the positive brush. when it rotates and comes to the position you are referring the secondary will have no power in it as it will be at the zero volt line.

Marathonman

Not easy :
the plus sign (at/From)  is connected to the brush (you have five) and the negative (brush? at) is connected to the negative of the primaries

See pic of my interpretation

How about short cut at start up (with ext. battery?)

Regards Arne

[marathonman]

OMG your F-in stupid. sorry it is like talking to an 85 iQ dumb ass.
please don't worry about what i do as you must be so unintelligent to understand simple directions or explination. i have to ask you what grade did you complete, just curious as you are acting just like Cifta did for so many years. really stupid as usual.
Imagine that ! the norm for Seaad. what is the matter not getting enough attention boy to your crazy ideas.
How pathetic you are as i have explained in FULL DETAIL.
Typical seaad just like Hanon, Cifta,  Bistander and the list goes on and on and on and on and i am wondering when will your BS ever end. please go away, like forever. you can disrupt but you can NEVER STOP ME FOOL ie TROLL.
Marathonman

[citfta]

If you are going to be such a lowlife pathetic person that you will continue to attack me after I have publicly apologized to you, would you please learn how to properly spell my user name.  Even a 5 year old can copy how to spell something.


My user name is CITFTA


And seaad is correct.  Your new design for part G sucks.  It has too many problems with it to ever work like you think it will.

[marathonman]

It's to bad your to ignorant to realize the C has already been tested in sim and on the bench and verified by another builder and it worked like a charm so G-T-H fools. your less intelligent than i first imagined.
here we go again you idiots thinking i was wrong when i was right the whole time and it only took 5 or 6 years to pull your head out of your back side. so who is the non intelligent one.
Please from now on don't run your mouth when you know absolutely nothing about the C core part G or how it performs because that is all you are doing is running your mouths. (TYPICAL)
try acting like researchers instead of TROLLS.
it could be SHITFA for all i care.
so go back to E and work on that piece of junk you call part G and maybe, just maybe someday it will work as good as my C core.

also your foolish attempts to get a good output have failed and will continue to fail as is UFOP's output also which if you would have read post 4527 you wouldn't be in that situation.
you knowing more than me, yah right. iv'e heard all the BS before.

Marathonman