Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[SolarLab]

Related - Comparing the Fuguera and LinGen Devices

Fuguera's 1908 Patent 44267 appears to be very much the same as the so called "LinGen"
found in-part in Holcomb's WO2018134233A2 Patent.

Figuera uses 7 "poles" (in the diagram) whereas the LinGen employs 8 "poles"
(in the diagram - initial analysis) and Figuera excites his device with a mechanical
commutator driven by a small motor.  The induced coils (Y) are placed between
two inducer coils.

Whereas the LinGen is excited (coils are driven) with a microprocessor and MOSFET
switches to create signal pulses and a BEMF recovery scheme. The induced coil is a
single Lap winding near the inducer windings.

Both schemes take advantage of the increase in magnetic flux density offered by the
soft magnetic material (metal or soft magnetic compound [SMC]) B-H Curves and
employ a "moving magnetic field" with no component physical movement.

It should be viable to incorporate the best characteristics of both schemes into one,
including the timing and sequencing methods. {In process}

Insight into the LinGen development, including CAE generated animated gif's, proof
of concept, etc. can be found in this thread starting here:
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98509#msg98509 

SL 

[floodrod]

...

[SolarLab]

...

Hi Floodrod,

Saw the video, good stuff!   Anyway, I've got a "deal" for you (?), if you're interested:

- Take a "C Clamp" around your coils [inducer | inducee | inducer] if you can find one
that big - with insulators {paper} between the cores {"|"} and record any differences.
Curious what changes might occur, if any, when the "magnetic circuit" is completed.

- In return - I will attemp a 3D CAE analysis of the coils {time permitting} if you
can provide the Core dimensions (X-Y-Z), wire guage; # of turns and Coil
dimensions (L-W-H); and drive waveform. Curious if the CAE comes anywhere near
"real life measurements." 

Will build it up one pole at a time in an attemp to see where the "break even" and "OU"
points start to appear {seemed like around 6/7 poles is where the LinGen showed promise}.

Regards,

SL

[SolarLab]

Figuera's various patents show a variety of configurations but I don't
see where any specific or prefered combination is given. Hanon has
some good ideas so I'll look at those as well.

Typical patent where all things are considered  ! So we'll use CAE...

[floodrod]

SL,

I will check my clamps tonight and try to get you some of those numbers.

I deleted the video because The setup is not optimal. Don't want to add too much confusion and misinformation.  I think I could do this much more efficiently and eliminate some of the unneeded diodes in the rectifiers. I now also know how to tie the negatives of the electromagnets together, and it will be safe to use the scope with a common ground.

Reading all the patents, he goes on to talk about how if you use the Earth's magnetic field and cut the flux with a loop of wire, you can double triple quadruple or even 100 fold the output depending on how many loops you use. The only thing holding us back is Lenz Law. But the same magnetic field can be used again and again and again.

I will be trying to accurately chart reactiveness tonight. I have a hunch that this setup makes the electromagnets practically reactiveless regardless what frequency you put into them.