Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[daugustus]

Wow, I have read some hundreds of pages of Patrick Kelly´s manual and just now have read about this generator!

Except for silverhealtheu´s proposal, which I´m not sure if has already been replicated successfully, and the Kunel patent. seems this is the simplest high power generator there...

Now, in Patrick´s book I saw the inner parts of the iron frames all rounded, which seems is something not easy to find.

Would this shape be a critical point?

Bajac,

First, congratulations on your work and, second, have you already made measurements on the output?

[bajac]

Daugustus,

Thank you for your participation.

I assume that you are referring to the inner corners of the C shape iron cores. The rounding is not an issue. I am using 90 degrees corners.

Thanks again,
Bajac

[bajac]

 I have compared the designs from Clemente Figuera and Thanes Heins and concluded that the 100 years old concept is more efficient. The following are the bases for the conclusion:

Can you see a pattern between the apparatus of Figuera and Heins? Figuera's design consists in placing a secondary coil between two primary coils. Meanwhile, Heins' design shows a primary coil between two secondary coils.

As I already explained in my paper about the Figuera's apparatus, the induced secondary magnetic field is pulled away from the inducing primary coil by the other primary coil. That is, there is no magnetic fields interaction between the inducing primary coil and the induced secondary coil. However, this is no true for the Heins' apparatus.

First, the Heins' apparatus found in this link:

http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/16180925?hostedIn=slideshare&referer=http://www.slideshare.net/ThaneCHeins#

indicates that the magnetic fields of the two secondary coils must interact with the primary in order for the apparatus to work. Moreover, in order for the Heins' apparatus to have an optimum performance, the load on the secondary coils must be matched.

If you already read my article, you can see that the magnetic field distribution of the Heins' design and shown in the above link is not correct. Because the magnetic field does not have a beginning or an end, it is not possible to have them flowing within the iron cores, only. Therefore, the secondary magnetic fields must cross the air gap windows of the Heins' device to reach and interact with the only primary coil. When the loads connected to the secondary coils are the same, the net influence of the induced fields on the primary coil is zero. The effects of the secondary coils onto the primary are null and it can say that the Lenz's law effect has been mitigated.

Second, if the secondary loads are not properly matched, the resultant of the secondary magnetic fields will react with the primary field in such a way as to oppose the primary magnetic field. As a consequence, the effects of the Lenz's law are not completely cancelled and the current through the primary coil will increase. And,

Third, because of one secondary coil, the Figuera's transformer should have lower output impedance than the Hein's transformer. Having two secondary coils increases the magnetic flux losses and the wire resistance.

The Heins' transformer should work better if the two secondary coils are connected in series to add their voltages. In this way you will always guarantee that the secondary magnetic fields are properly matched.

Finally, I have finished the construction of the primary and secondary coils. See my progress in the following photos: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/405/bobinasprimarias.jpg/

Bajac   

[bajac]

 Because of the criticality when matching the induced magnetic fields in the Heins transformer, in addition to matching the loads and the two secondary coils, the magnetic circuit must be symmetrical with respect to the center line passing through the primary coil. Any mismatch of these two halves can create serious instability issues. Said that, I expect the Heins transformer to be a little bit tricky to make it work.

Bajac

[hanon]

I have simulated in Excel the output signal from the comutator as designed in 1908 (I have posted the Excel file with the simulation)

In the Excel file you can play with different values of the resistors and the inner resistance of each electromagnets, and even, you can play with one or two brushes defined as a second contact certain number of steps ahead of he first one.

Clearly Clemente Figuera was searching to create two DC signals which are unphased by 90º. The signals never reach zero voltage.