Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[TinselKoala]

This is actually a punch to me really. Earlier in posts Farmhand has claimed that a device cannot produce more output than input. Now you provide the proof that a device can provide more output than input. Why don't you show a video of your 30000 watts output transformer in youtube video for a 75 watts input..for the benefit of poor souls like me. Since it is your claim you can demonstrate it.

There is nothing special about making more Watts at peak output than input, because POWER IS NOT ENERGY. Ask Farmhand, he has devices too that produce more peak power output than they use as input, by far. He knows that these devices are not overunity and cannot "self sustain" or be "self-looped". Naive measurements -- such as are likely to be performed by patent examiners who are not physicists or electrical engineers -- will see the peak power levels and believe that some "energy" amplification is happening, when actually it is nothing of the sort.

You want to see some video demonstrations of power amplification? You, who mention Tesla's name in your posts? Take a look at my YT channel.

But let's start simple, shall we? Here's a transformer working without any metal, iron or otherwise, in the core or anywhere nearby.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6uQUxC7DS8

So that's one of your silly claims put to rest, right there.

[NRamaswami]

Regarding your challenge, I can easily take the 18 layer quadfilar test and show it. I don't understand why it happens..But the magnet that is made is very powerful.

I will also demonstrate the Figuera device.

I understand that compared to you my knowledge is very little in this field but the results can be replicated easily. I would appreciate if you show the 75 watts input 30000 watts output transformer in a video to all of us. I would be very obliged.

[hanon]

Hi NRamaswami,

Please don't enter in the game initiated by Tinsekoala. This user is the first time that participate into this thread...what a coincidence... You are just sharing your empirical results...if someone don't want to understand this it is not our problem. Just ignore those users...As Don Quixote said :"Dogs are barking, therefore we are getting closer"

Keep on testing and doing a good work, and avoid going into these dirty games

Best regards and good luck!!

[TinselKoala]

If you honestly show your 18-layer thing and your measurements, we can figure out why you are getting the results you think you are getting. I assure you... magnets, no matter how strong, do not "eat" electricity. However a large inductor like you are describing can definitely present a high impedance to an AC power supply, which would prevent a series light bulb from lighting perceptibly under some conditions. Did you measure the current through your device with a proper instrument, or are you simply relying on your visual judgement of the brightness of the bulb? I think I already know the answer to that question.

Now... before we go any further, please acknowledge that you are wrong about transformers requiring iron or magnetizable metal in order to operate.

[TinselKoala]

Hi NRamaswami,

Please don't enter in the game initiated by Tinsekoala. This user is the first time that participate into this thread...what a coincidence... You are just sharing your empirical results...if someone don't want to understand this it is not our problem. Just ignore those users...As Don Quixote said :"Dogs are barking, therefore we are getting closer"

Keep on testing and doing a good work, and avoid going into these dirty games

Best regards and good luck!!

So then, I guess that user "hanon" also believes that transformers need iron cores to work, that they can be prevented from working by wrapping in copper and plastic, that magnets eat electricity, that an Amplidyne is self sustaining....  but instead of providing evidence, he chooses to attack me personally instead !!

What a hoot you people are. This is better than watching daytime television, for sure!!