Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

Farmhand

If we take a coil and vary the DC current though it it will make an all DC wave of one polarity to one end of the inductor and the other polarity to the other end of the inductor. If the current through an inductor is DC and only one way then one end of the inductor will be positive always when energized and the other end will be negative always when energized, the south inductor can simply be fed the other way or turned around to make the south pole face the secondary. No reversal of current through the primaries will result in a DC wave on the coil all above zero or all below zero depending on the one you look at.

A coil given a varying DC current will produce a magnet that has one north end and one south end with no reversals. The patent shows he used the north end of one magnet on one side and the south end of the other magnet on the other side, and the currents were 90 degrees out of phase.

Figuera did have an AC supply, he had motors and generators. But he built this. I think he did it just to remove the need for a rotating generator to get AC electricity. If he found it produced free energy, fair enough. If he actually did then we should be able to do the same.

The effect of the two opposite poles on opposite sides of the secondaries out of phase causes an AC wave in the secondary, I guess.

IF you take an AC source and use a capacitor to split the phase then use diodes to give only positive currents to each of the primaries 90 degrees out of phase so that one primary produces a north pole towards the secondary and the other produces a south pole towards the secondary then the object of the resistor array should be achieved.

But then how to self run ?

Cheers

marathonman

According to From Buforn patent No. 57955 pic posted by hanon it clearly shows that the primary cores are larger than the secondaries. this is as i stated in earlier post that the cores are double in size than the secondary or substantially larger now more evident than ever. if the N S Electromagnets are shared with the next group then the flux would have to be large enough for two core outputs plus losses. if you study the patient drawing it looks quite possible that the output cores could be sitting on top of the N S primaries in a T fashion.remember it is suppose to be ridiculously easy. see my drawing and advise. additional winding could be made on primaries or secondaries to make self running as stated by Hanon i think from patients.

marathonman

Or even this set up could be possible for that matter. just remember Electromagnets are far more powerful than magnets by many, many more orders of magnitude .

NRamaswami

Marathonman:

Your second drawing looks great.. It is a modular design.

I have tested one of the cores like this with one single module in a square pattern . Inputs and outputs are parallel. All follows the NS-NS-NS-NS pattern.

There was no output and magnetism disappeared. I do not know why. If we use it in a straight line we do get magnetism in all 4 electromagnets but when we put all of them in the square pattern magnetism disappeared. I have not checked by reversing the poles as to make like poles are placed parallel to each other. I really do not know why magnetism disappears under the sqaure pattern when it is present in a straight line. Of course I used the inefficient method of a common core in the straight line method before Doug pointed it out and advised that it is inefficient. This is why I draw the attention that in the patents of Buforn or for that matter Figuera the core is only half inserted in to the inductor magnets and not shown to be fully inserted from end to end. This is the question I asked..

Farmhand

The way I see the drawing each section goes like the drawing below basically. The north magnet is fed a "lump" of DC and as the current is declining in the north magnet the current is rising in the south magnet, as the current in the south magnet is declining the current in the north magnet is rising to begin the next cycle. We need to remember there is a difference of phase and level in the applied voltage, the current will follow accordingly. That's how I see it, the flux in the induced coil "secondary" is always changing polarity due to the phase difference between the north and south excitation.

More elements could be added in series, but the patent show open ends doesn't it, so maybe it cant be made into a circle or a square.