Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[gyulasun]

Monster Ferrite Rods http://www.stormwise.com/page26.htm
Paper towel  cardboard centers and toilet paper centers covered in resin are good bobbins to.

Thanks for this, though they do not do foreign orders... just within USA.

Gyula

[Farmhand]

OK some more tests with a 180 phased inverter type driver circuit, my coil set is pictured below. Some things to consider are that the excitement of the secondary is by making the core magnetized in a varying way, there is no direct induction to the secondary from the primary as there is in one coil wound on top of another. This tells me that the primary magnetic field strength or density transferred to the secondary's core determines the output of the secondary. So if in my drawing the left primary has a north end facing the secondary then during the left primary current flow the secondary core will become north near the left magnet core end and if the current was kept on it would make the entire core (EDIT: to the right of the neutral zone in the energized coil) north after a short time, like an extension of the primary core. However due to the coil I think this is different. Anyway I see this as kind of like switching a permanent magnet flux through a coils core. The magnetization delay through the core means the flux is going from one end to the other. My coils with full inductance are 60 mH primaries and 220 mH secondary.

I tried one north and one south magnet and also with Two north magnets ( both north ends of the primaries facing the opposite ends of the secondary). With 50% duty to each coil with both primaries north end facing the core I got a sine wave, though not efficient with respect to the secondary output and because I was using square edged pulses I had to collect the coil discharges into another battery, which greatly improved efficiency. My cores are gapped to the thickness of a card or so. Putting a load on the secondary only slightly increased the input but the output was not much through a 266 Ohm resistor 13 or 14 volts.

I think the drawings are not clear enough to get a good picture of how the coils and cores are actually configured. I can think of another way they could be made different to how i did it.

I'll do some more tests with DC and a compass, I was tired towards the end of last night.

It might be a plan for those without a commutator and resistor array to direct the discharge of one primary coil to go through the other primary coil back and forth I have a plan for that arrangement.

So simple a child could put it together, pffft, that means we are all less knowledgable than children, I reject that. I guess if they had all the parts already made and clear instructions on how to arrange it a child could but I fail to see how a child could decipher that patent. That's ridiculous.

Cheers

[marathonman]

You could try larger Primaries like this, "Flux concentration"  as Figueras shows larger Primary any ways in Patient ?

[dieter]

Marathonman, that's looking good, I wonder how the impact of such a concentration would be.


Farmhand - I was wrong about 180° being no good. I made some further tests and it turned out, 180°, or when AC is used just to exchange the poles on one primary, performs even slightly better than 90°. So I dropped the phaseshifting cap and simply connected one primary in reverse, but both from 12 Vac (actually about 2 Vac, because there is a 27 ohm resistor to limit the max dissipation).


But I got some really exciting news, I may have cracked the secret (I know I said that already twice, but this time it is really something huge). It is very simple, gives 5x more energy, could well be the secret of the Figuera Generator and may have something to do with the Coil set that I have made, because it works only under certain wiring conditions. Using other connections , even although the coils did some transforming, the effect was not seen.


All those who insist on a commutator are on the right track! I found this so exciting that I made a video. It explains it all. Watch this:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2WCAA6st_s&feature=youtu.be


Regards

[gyulasun]

Dear Dieter,

Do you think that instead of 'sparking' the input AC 12V, a bidirectional MOSFET switch driven from a CMOS 555 timer  could substitute your 'hand switching'? Or the 'spark' is an absolutely needed 'ingredience' and no substitute exists for it?

I would like to understand how you arrived at the 5x more energy?

(For me, it is not good to see you short the output capacitor (i.e. the output) with putting the voltage meter into the Amper meter mode with the range switch... Have you considered where the output voltage has gone when your Amper meter showed 'plenty of Amps'?  Please do not be cross with me... I ask this NOT to tease you but to think this over.)

Thanks,  Gyula