Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ALVARO_CS]

I think Mr. Ramaswami stated long tubes one after the other, may be like this attached.
he will tell us which one is the closer to his setup.
Regards
Alvaro

[hanon]

I had always wondered why Figuera used two primaries. It is clear that he looked for a balance of forces between both them to get and special effect. If not he just had used one primary.

I have an official document that shows that Figuera kept working in a new design after selling the 1902 patent. Maybe he was upset after seeing that they buried his generator. He derived a new design in his 1908 patent

Buforn paid all his patents until 1914.

Regards

[NRamaswami]

Hi:

1. Air gaps were present in between the cores.

2. The drawing given by ALVARO_CS is very close to what we did. My eyesight is poor and I'm not able to figure out what is the difference between his two figures. Both of them look the same to me.

3. All other earlier drawings are not correct. ALVARO_CS has understood my description correctly.

The drawin that shows an E core and I core in the middle and another E core in the reverse direction is wrong. This is all one straight tube and I said it is rocket like or pencil like to make things more clear. ALVARO_CS is very correct in his drawings but I do not see what is the difference between his two figures.

4. You can connect two step down transformers in series. Amperage will remain reduced but voltage of the two will be combined as the secondaries are in series. This is common knowledge. When we add a middle section where the forces that operate are not the normal forces of magnetic repulsion but forces of magnetic attraction between opposite poles, voltage and amperage increases further..

The problem is that all of you are educated in theory. I'm not..So not knowing things will not work, I have carried out experiments and when we found that the texts do not describe what happens clearly but the experimental results are contradictory, we went by the experimental results..Nothing more..

By the way, how many of you know how to convert iron to permanent magnet and how many of you have actually converted iron to permanent magnet? Real hands on experience..For many electricians I contacted did not know and have not performed that part and did not even that knowledge..

I have reported my experimental findings.. nothing more..I will do the experiments with a step down transformer and let you all know what is the usable output obtained. That I think should solve the issue..

[NRamaswami]

Hi Forest:

All wires are 4 sq mm wires that can carry up to 24 amps.

Both secondary and primary are only 4 sq mm wires.

We bought coils after coils of wires of 4 sq mm only. Then put them all together and wrapped up them to make a quadfilar coil. I do not remember the exact number of layers of primary but it was four layers and both primary sides had the same number of layers and same number of turns. Then the magnetic field strength is approximately equal.

However the resistor effect may be there due to the current circulating four times in the primary P1 first before it went to P2 where it circulated another four times before it returned to mains.

Will it have any effect? I really do not have any theoretical knowledge on this part. Nor do I have equipment to measure these things nor I have knowledge or experience in handling such equipment or even what those equipment are..

[forest]

hanon


In my opinion,in
1918 Hubbard took exactly the same and slightly improved version of device, and in 1921 he had already finished 8 -transformer device in loop,  self-running and producing 40kW output. Between 1918 and 1939 you can found surprisingly many free energy inventors taking energy from Earth "atmosphere".