Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

I was reading the book "Ferranti and the British electrical industry, 1864-1930, by J. F. Wilson, and the following called my attention. It is a statement found in the last paragraph on page 26,

"It is interesting to note that it was from his childhood 'bible', Ganot's Treatise on Physics, that the germ of the Ferranti meter was born, proving that his grasp of electro-magnetic theory had improved significantly since early stumblings with a perpetual motion machine in 1879."

It would be important to find more information about this claim, but this is the only reference I found connecting Ferranti with overunity generators. If you take into account that by 1882 Ferranti was heavily involved in the design of novel electric power plants, then, it was not that long ago when he was claiming overunity machines. This answer a question that I had about if Ferranti ever knew the overunity capability of his generators. Was Ferranti forced to keep his mouth shut in this regard? 

[Doug1]

"Just as a curiosity, how many of you think that the N and S shown in the Figueras patents were meant for magnetic North and South?"

  No not ever. There is a relative motion of the magnetic field from the perspective
of the induced coil which implies a direction of the inducer fields relative motion compared to the coil and core which it occupies which is independent in both inducers and induced. Each set being two inducers and one induced are all independent fields. The two inducers impart their motion separately to the Y induced so they can conserve the input of current rather then directly transform it into the Y coil as would by transformer action.
  The N and S only to define individualism other wise there would be the corresponding pole for each coil to indicate the orientation of each coil with a complete NS Y NS or NS Y SN. The ends of the coils which are tied to the resistive controller + are so positioned to indicate the magnetic orientation of the coils if they were static devices which they are not so it does not make any sense to dwell on that. They may maintain a north and south pole which increases and decreases but from the point of view of the Y coil (induced) the relative motion is reversed.

[Doug1]

Hanon

How many turns do you have on your coils? How many volts/amps per turn? Number of turns divided by the volts and amps powering the coil?

[forest]

bajac

I think we are progressing so fast we need a quick look into the past and connect dots.
I strongly suggest this is  related (somehow): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ylYgUOfUzY
and this also http://www.richlandsource.com/community/article_fbac1344-779e-11e3-8a2f-10604b9f7e7e.html

[forest]

nelsonrochaa
I'm really interested in Your ideas about how this type of energy is created, what is the source ?
There must be a source, I don't believe physics laws to be so incomplete.
Who can prove what is the source of excess energy ? Figuera stated it was magnetic field (not just conversion of mechanical energy into electricity).