Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

HaHa..What is this.. That Patent is not valid you see?Why?

It says opposite pole faces must be used to induce electricity..How come our NN or SS only team rely on this not valid any more patent..

You see this is the relevant part of the 378 Patent..

The inventors, who subscribe, constitute their generator, as follows: Several
electromagnets are arranged opposing each other, and their opposite pole
faces separated by a small distance. The cores of all these electromagnets are
formed in such a way that they will magnetize and demagnetize quickly and not
retain any residual magnetism. In the empty space remaining between the pole
faces of the electromagnets of these two series, the induced wire passes in one
piece, or several, or many. An excitatory current, intermittent, or alternating,
actuates all the electromagnets, which are attached or in series, or in parallel,
or as required, and in the induced circuit will arise currents comprising,
together, the total generator current. That allows suppressing the mechanical
force, since there is nothing which needs to be moved. The driving current, or is
an independent current, which, if direct, must be interrupted or changed in sign
alternately by any known method, or is a part of the total current of the
generator, as it is done today in the current dynamos.

Founded on these considerations, Mr. Clemente Figuera and Mr. Pedro
Blasberg, in the name and on behalf of the society "Figuera-Blasberg"
respectfully requests to be granted final patent of invention for this generator
whose form and arrangement are shown in the attached drawings, warning that,
in them, and for clarity are sketched only eight electromagnets, or two sets of
four excitatory electromagnets in each, and the induced circuit is marked by a
thick line of reddish ink, being this way the general arrangement of the
appliance, but meaning that you can put more or less electromagnets and in
another form or grouping.
The invention for which a patent is applied consists in following note.

Note
Invention of an electric generator without using mechanical force, since nothing
moves, which produces the same effects of current dynamo-electric machines
thanks to several fixed electromagnets, excited by a discontinuous or
alternating current which creates an induction in the motionless induced circuit,
placed within the magnetic fields of the excitatory electromagnets.


Note is the claimed Portion. This is precisely what I did for a long time. I have then realized that If the core is already saturated peremanent magnet and cannot be demagnetized the current drawn will be lower while the output will be higher.

You only need to wind two electromagnets with 10 filar coils. Then remove one of them and insulate both its ends to make it a 9 filar coil. Then do it for another coil to make it 8 filar coil.

A 10 filar coil draws only 0.5 amps if it is serially connected and 2.5 amps if it is connected in parallel. But you remove one or two coils then the current drawn is 15 to 25 amps. The core is saturated and you get an enormous output in excess of the input.

If you place permanent magnets in the core the input is reduced in the primary as the amperage needed for making the core saturated is less and there is no complete magnetic field collapse.

In any case I have tested and speak from my experience and my own troubles.

Ah Ha.. What is a Coffee Break meant for.. Go to overunity.com and Bomb Ramaswami and enjoy the 15 minutes..You all made my day..

Enjoy your weekend..Bye Bye

[hanon]

Doug, The real essence is in both patents, being the 1908 more detailed. NR seems to be affected by the radiation which emits his device. I am only posting quotes. In Spain there is proverb saying: No hay peor sordo que el que no quiere oir. Google it.

[Doug1]

Thats a very nice way to put it Hannon. Out here and over yonder in the sticks we just shorten it to "you cant fix stupid".

[NRamaswami]

Doug:

That I'm so stupid is very well known. So do not bring your reputation down..I had been sufficiently stupid enough to disclose full information in public domain. I had also provided full information on how to replicate what I do. It was checked independently by at least one friend who found majority of my statements to be correct about the 2013 experiment but found that neither primary is drawing so much power nor is the output as claimed and that the voltage divided.

I had also gone to the University where the Professor refused to accept any voltage but treated it only as a shorted coil and accepted only the amperage. The other professor who is a Chemistry expert explained that it is only due to the Earth connections acting as an Earth battery that the results have come. The replicator could not make Earth connections.

By the way how many have fixed so far and if so where is the proof? How many have disclosed all that they have done?

I have repeatedly disclosed that while it is possible to get higher output than input I could not do a self sustaining device. I'm not a trained person and so there is nothing to feel ashamed to accept it. I have checked with a lot of people. I had been strongly criticised by a Professor who has done her PhD from a University in an European Country and has worked in IIT Madras and retired and has strongly criticised me for not providing for Magnetic shielding. I concede and agree that my knowledge is very limited.

Now you please answer these questions..Even if I do not do it others may be able to do it.

a. Is is true that if you do not draw loads from the secondary the primary does not have lenz drag or will not consume higher?

B. Can we provide a feeback to the primary from secondary by adding a capacitor to the secondary output which will be in phase with primary or use a transformer to do it?

I may not be able to do all but other replicators may be able to do it. I do not claim to know all nor do I make any theories that what I say is right and if you do not accept you are stupid. I do not make statements like that. 

Be calm. We have reached a very advanced level now. But I have my constraints. Funds. Trained staff. While we work in Airconditioned room the outside temperature is 107 to 108'F (42 to 43'C here)

The secret of the devices is simple. You should not use the secondary output to power the load. You all can call me stupid and deaf but I really do not care. This is the fact. Without using the secondary to power the load how it can be used to power the primary non stop. If you can advise me. If you cannot I have no problem. I donot claim to know all.

There are other devices that are non polluting and that hold significant promise and while they are dangerous, there is no EM Radiation from a saturated core.

[marathonman]

Quote; "The secret of the devices is simple. You should not use the secondary output to power the load. You all can call me stupid and deaf but I really do not care. This is the fact. Without using the secondary to power the load how it can be used to power the primary non stop. If you can advise me. If you cannot I have no problem. I do not claim to know all."

In this case i think the shoe fits quite nicely, not a clue in the world.