Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

No..I understand that part of Lenz law is applicable to a single primary single secondary situation.  It is not exactly the case when other variables are present. 

Take the example of magnetic amplifiers impacting a transformer. There are videos online to show the effect.  Lenz law effect is neutralise here. Why.

Similarly if you put two primaries to focus their strength in the center and oppose each other what happens the middle section is enormously increased in field strength. Thus is called additive flux if I understand correctly.

Wikipedia calls it conservation of momentum as the action between an electrin and a proton. Here the flux cannot oppose.  It has to add.

Secondly what I observed has been explained to me as amperage coming in from the earth battery where the reaction was increased manifold.  Patrick has taught me that Figuera device is an asymmetrical transformer while Lenz law is applicable to symmetrical transformers.

Notwithstanding theory we have observed many times 104 to 116.% output when we wind secondary on both sides of primary but we have ignored it as meter error.  It is only when we had very high readings and after the Electrician passd away and I had chest pain I posted the info.

Please explain how Lenz law can be explained when you introduce magnetic amplifiers. You are the first to introduce this concept anyway here.

When proper geometrical shapes are used identical poles opposing each other eill cause an induced current to flow in properly placed secondary coils. Both the primaries in that instant are repelling each other. The output should be without Lenz. Again we have two primaries here.

What you applies to what is normal einding patterns normally used.

I also know how the magnetic drag can be reduced in a rotating device and consumption of current reduced. But I haven't tested them for generation as they are very small units.

LancaIV. . Sir how are you able to modify your posts after my reply. Once sime reply is posted I cannot modify my posts. Amazing.

Any way with due respect the device is very simple. There is a missing component in the patent and no one has focused on it. I think the information overload has prevented people from taking action and observing things.

Regards

Ramaswami

[NRamaswami]

Oh..This is the difference between transformers and generator. .well. Doug I used soft iron rods and weak residual magnetism is present in about 15% of the rods. They are very weak though.

You can say impurities are the reason.

Can you point out the specific part of the patent thatvsays no residual magnetism is present.

Regards

Ramaswami

[lancaIV]

The above calculation is only an approximate calculation, in the small losses, such as copper losses are not taken into account in the armature of the electrical equipment, energy losses for rotating the inertia around the machine with the required angular velocity and the like. The bill is intended to show that a large amount of energy can be obtained by only a fraction of the output power, but not some form of external energy is consumed.

angular velocity ? a trial : http://milesmathis.com/angle.html
                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"......how are you able to modify your posts.."
Ramaswami,this function is to moderate myself ! After teste-phase you will get this ability,too !

Sincerely

[hanon]

This is from a 2012 version of Patrick Kelly ebook, chapter 3, about Richard Willis generator and a simplified version done from a user called silverhealtheu.

"
The input power supply is fed to an electromagnet but is converted into a pulsed supply by the use of an interrupter switch which may be mechanical or electronic. As can be seen, the arrangement is particularly simple although it is an unusual configuration with the electromagnet core touching one of the permanent magnets and not the other. The magnet and electromagnet poles are important, with the permanent magnet North poles pointing towards the electromagnet and when the electromagnet is powered up, it's South pole is towards the North pole of the permanent magnet which it is touching. This means that when the electromagnet is powered up, it's magnetic field strengthens the magnetic field of that magnet.

There is a one-centimetre gap at the other end of the electromagnet and it's North pole opposes the North pole of the second permanent magnet. With this arrangement, each electromagnet pulse has a major magnetic effect on the area between the two permanent magnets

...
Silverhealtheu.   One of the EVGRAY yahoo forum members whose ID is 'silverhealtheu' has described a simple device which appears to be not unlike the Richard Willis generator above.

The device consists of an iron bar one inch (25 mm) in diameter and one foot (300 mm) long. At one end, there is a stack of five neodymium magnets and at the opposite end, a single neodymium magnet. At the end with the five magnets, there is a coil of wire which is strongly pulsed by a drive circuit. Down the length of the bar, a series of pick-up coils are positioned. Each of these coils picks up the same level of power that is fed to the pulsing coil and the combined output is said to exceed the input power.

"

Look for the similarities with Figuera...

[tak22]

fyi

silverhealtheu = bolt on this forum