Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Having issue with site

Started by Magluvin, October 15, 2012, 02:07:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ionizer

Skeptics are not a waste of time.
Stefan is affraid the skeptics will make people lose interest and go away so he misses ad money.
There is nothing wrong with scepticism.
They also deserve a place in the discussion.
Ruling out scepticism pushes the quality of this board below zero.
But it was already there so there is no difference  ;D

powercat

TK brings up a very good point about people who actually make claims that they have achieved overunity,
they must be challenged we need to find out how feasible their device is as soon as possible,
the world is facing a serious environmental disaster and we desperately need a solution.

Also people who make false claims and give misleading information must be exposed,
If the free energy community and this forum want to maintain any credibility.
The alternative is to be overrun with scams.

Most of the threads on this forum are about research and looking into ways of developing Overunity devices,
Now I'm sure most of us will agree that challenging those people involved in research is not helpful to anyone,
surely we must try and help people researching.

But people who claim they have done it and then they don't prove their case and still say it works
Surely they deserve criticism from any skeptic, we can't save the environment on blind faith.
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall

ionizer

Yes Powercat but that is not what Stefan wants he want's the discussion to go on for as long as possible so he makes the most money off of it.
If it is proven to be a scam in one day he misses alot of money compared to it becomming a thread of 800 pages which runs for years which means jackpot to him so he want's to rule out the people that try to expose false claims.

I see you are in believe the world is facing a serious environmental disaster and we desperately need a solution.
There are a lot of solutions to this problem but this board is not the correct place to find them.
This board is about Stefan's bank account and not about solving the energy crisis.
If you want to find real solutions you need something else.

powercat

@ionizer
If Stefan is only interested in money how come when he was on holiday he visited members in the UK and France
to see their workshops and their research, I don't believe any of them were claiming Overunity.

One of the longest running threads on this forum has nothing to do with a claim of Overunity
It's all about research and people coming together to improve efficiency.
http://www.overunity.com/6123/jule-thief/

And why have I seen Stefan himself doing research and testing and putting his own work on Youtube,
that doesn't sound to me like someone only interested in money.
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall

verpies

@Stefan

Do not censor the Scientific Skeptics. See here for their definition.
If you do this, you will be moving away from the Scientific Method.