Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[UncleFester]

@ All

Been following this thread for a while now and sorry to interject but I get the feeling that the original cause of Uncle-Fester's runaway was caused by the fact that "I was leaking voltage across this area and getting a remnant of the power supply which was multiplied mains @ 318 VAC @ 60hz".

As Groundloop mentioned the possibility of a magnetic pulsating field, could it have been caused by the remnant of the power supply as in AC on top of DC?

Regards,
Paul

This would be true if the magnets had been touching the toroidal windings, but yet they did not during this test because it was ceramic C5's that were used for the field, they are non conductive and smaller so they do not touch the toroid at all. Also, the effect would continually lose power over time and be less than COP=1 and would eventually stop. Thus, this result was only obtained using the small neon inverter circuit and not the doubled mains supply. Even if this amounted to skin effect pontential on the toroidal windings, there would be no way to loop the input, REMOVE the battery, and let it run itself. So something else was going on here. But where did the energy gain come from?

I suspect that the toroid was putting out just enough wattage from the VSG effect to supply the neon supply input with enough power to run itself. However I am not sure why the voltage on the output would continually and quickly rise unless there was an over unity situation. I am still scratching my head on that one, but I am going to go back to basics and replicate the JLN/Juan setup and see what I get. Not using the neon any more because is sprays emf all over the place and clearly is what the Geiger counter is reading.....

It is clear that the formula of Juan's for capacitance will be useful and looks correct based on the small amount of test data I already have. The wild ideas about creating spiral wound capacitors and such around the carbon is cool, but leaves one broke and out of time in the long run, which is why I am sticking to known variations. And I do believe Juan is telling the truth since there is simply too much data that is accurately correlated to my test data. He clearly either has a unit that indeed works, or he has someone he is ad-libbing who has a working unit.

[hartiberlin]

Hi All,
I am not amazed, that some of you do not see any effects
just by using carbon resistors...

There are many different types of graphite and carbon mixes...

It probably depends on the right ingredients inside these
graphite rods and theright crystal structure.

Maybe the successful builder could post a picture
or thesource of their used graphite rods ?

As I have experiments last year pretty much with saltwater batteries
using different graphite setups
and my girlfriend helps me to find a cheap method to
produce my own graphite,
See here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,790.0.html

It is very obvious, that it might depend on the source, where
the graphite is coming from.

Different graphite sources also gave me different voltage readings
in these battery cells.

I guess we should try it out with the exact rods that the 2 interviewed
inventors have used.
Please post your exact specification of the rods
and where you got them from.

Also looking forward to the first pictures and movies
of the selfrunning device.
Many thanks.


Regards, Stefan.

[Goat]

@ Uncle Fester

Thanks for the clarification, what you have just mentioned and along with the last posts from Feyman and All I now understand

I think what you have disovered here is of great importance, 30 seconds self run is not to be ignored!  That's a long time for a short unless something was acting against it, like the charcoal rod or beta or magnetic.

A schematic would clear up what you just described, along with a parts list you used, for posterity before you move along to JNL's replication

Again, I believe what you have found is very important and it would be great if we could start a whole new thread.  We could start with your design and replicate with as close as possible to your original design and dissect, analyze, and maybe figure out what causes this effect to happen.

Regards,
Paul

[Feynman]

@Stefan

The rods Fester is using are 99.99% pure carbon,  5" x 1/2".   They are high purity used for transmission electron microscopy (TEM).   At this point it is no longer clear what theory supports the experiment, but it appears OU so I guess that's what matters.

1) Is it K-capture or something else?
2) If it's K-capture, are we emitting beta?  Are we emitting any X-rays? Are we emitting any photons at all here? 
3) If we are not emitting beta or x-rays, what is happening then? 
4) Is Fester getting any actually beta , or is it all EMI?
5) What happens if we put unexposed photographic paper near the device during runaway, then develop it?

6) Can we get a self-powering replication going?

[Inventor81]

Electron mother f**king microscopy?


That makes all the F**KING difference.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGH!

It's all but a monocrystalline block of da**ed graphite!