Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[Yucca]

Just a quick note, I've tried and tried dumping 64V 1mF into various carbon rods, when I dump into 0.6mm diameter 5mm length HB pencil lead I disintegrate the lead in a nice little bang! I have sandwidched the lead between two strong neos and have observed no difference in either the input or output(10ohm loaded toroid) transients, maybe my carbon isn't pure enough!

Also if we are expecting beta transmission 20ms (avg) after some nucleic transformation  then shouldn't we be expecting a gausiann pulse, peak of which is 20ms after firing rise? Juan doesn't mention this 20ms delay in any documentation, it appears his output pulse peak is well within <1ms of the firing pulse, what gives?

Having said this, I hope and dream more than I should that this is the real deal!

[aleks]

Also if we are expecting beta transmission 20ms (avg) after some nucleic transformation  then shouldn't we be expecting a gausiann pulse, peak of which is 20ms after firing rise?

JLN has these "gaussian" pulses (http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/vsg41.htm). If you convert timeline into log scale you'll see it. In fact, it's the "kick" we are probably looking for. Note that Dirac delta function is also modeled via gaussian curve. So, there some correlation available between transient time and power and the output. Among local experimenters only Otto was able to achieve these gaussian pulses on his o-scope.

It may sound a bit "sci fi", but I think these gaussian curves have something to do with space-time curvature. Otherwise it's pretty hard to envision natural physical process whose intensity varies over logarithmic timescale and in fact replicates gaussian curve (I just wonder if it affects past time since gaussian curve is known to have infinite span).

[Yucca]

Just another observation about the 60KW unit photo:

• The toroids appear to each sit on an aluminium 90deg bracket. There is no bracket above each toroid, just one bracket below each one.


• Each toroid has a standard steel toroid endcap on the top, none on the bottom.


• Each toroid has rigid PVC spacers next to upper and lower winding faces to prevent shorts against brackets or plates.

QED: There must be a tensile component, probably long pop rivet that joins the lower aluminium bracket to the top steel plate.

The question is by Juans calculations what volume of carbon must sit inside each toroid to give 6KW per toroid output and could that carbon fit betwix the pop rivet and the toroid wall?

By the way I think 6KW at 380V (~16A) is doable in each toroid pictured, just!

[allcanadian]

@Feynman

I think you may be better served by a picture than schematics, but maybe tonight we will get some pics... I will tell you my understanding.   Dead 12V battery with 6V measured on terminals running into small inverter at ~35khz, then into neon sign transformer, then into HV capacitor in series then discharged into the magnetically biased carbon rod.  Output flux is collected on toroidal transformer with the two output windings connected in parallel. This is then full-wave rectified, and hooked back up to the inverter.  Battery charges.  Battery is disconnected. Circuit keeps running , voltage climbs.  Geiger counter screeches, though this may be from the neon EMI rather than beta. Correct me if i left something out UncleFester.

I think you made some good points I would like to comment on
1)"Battery is disconnected. Circuit keeps running , voltage climbs."----- Here we could say that energy is generated somehow OR since the output is driving the input-- if the voltage rise per cycle is higher than the voltage drop(resistance) per cycle then the operation would be continuous until the qualities of the current could no longer produce the desired effects or the physical limitations of the circuit were exceeded.
2)"Geiger counter screeches, though this may be from the neon EMI rather than beta"-----
I think many times we can measure effects but we never know nor see the true nature of what is producing these effects. The geiger tube is essentially a neon tube with a central electrode or ionizing tube, I think the fact that some electronics were fried and the geiger counter screeching could also mean that a very short duration impulse that was electrostatic, magnetic or both in nature could be the cause. Tesla once said he could induce hundreds of thousands of volts into nearby free floating short conductors (not attached to anything) and we may be seeing just such effects---which also cause ionization as well.

I built a small model of this generator last night and found it to be very intersesting, especially the fact that a 24v DC input to the ends of the carbon rod produced continuous arcing and a 40v output on the collector coil surrounding the carbon rod(no toroid yet). The output was a clean sine wave at near 800KHz which I found quite unbelievable, so there is a voltage rise but this is not an energy gain so more testing will have to be done tonight.

[aleks]

One important thing to note during experimenting and beta detection is relative humidity of air. If humidity is low everything around collects a lot of static electricity which is easier converted into beta electrons. If air is humid, beta may not even manifest at all since no much surplus charge is available around lab equipment. It can be useful to engage some air ionizer that produces positive air ions in large quantities so that carbon rod pulses can accelerate something.