Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[Feynman]

Yes, the 'lost' kinetic energy will basically have to convert to heat, flux, photons, or some combination of the three.

[DrStiffler]

@All
Could someone please help me fined the huge 'Mylar' caps that Juan seems to have specified? I see in one place he talks about motor caps, where can I get a good oil cap of 40KuF?

Just for the hell of it here are some Mylar examples.

http://sales.goldmine-elec.com/pdf/243_pgs22-29.pdf

So why not electrolytic caps? if you are pulsing them at 5-60 hz they should work fine if you add a few extra, they just do not give up the stored energy very fast, but hey, 50-60hz is no problem?

But, gee I don't have any idea here.

[aleks]

Yes the 'lost' kinetic energy will basically have to convert to heat, flux, photons, or some combination of the three.

Probably heat and RF only. I do not see how it can be converted into "flux" if no load is connected. If electrons can't create flux by "transferring" their energy to electrons of conductivity they have to convert their energy into heat or RF.

Only pure magnetic monopoles may "give up" without transferring any energy beside creating some space-time ripple which is almost undetectable anyway.

[Feynman]

@aleks
The beta electrons could contribute to current (through 'flux cutting'), thus increasing the net power flux, right?    Maybe we should be specifying when we mean magnetic flux, electric flux, or power flux.    Of course, 'flux cutting' won't matter if there are zero beta rays.

@DrStiffler

There are no such caps unless you make them yourself.  Plus the ones that are around are really expensive. . . We are using electrolytics.  I don't know what he was talking about.  Juan was apparently a student or something in the lab which created this device.

[aleks]

The beta electrons could contribute to current (through 'flux cutting'), thus increasing the net power flux, right?    Maybe we should be specifying when we mean magnetic flux, electric flux, or power flux. 

I always mean magnetic flux - i.e. moving/varying magnetic field. In fact, I personally do not differentiate between magnetics and electricity since in my book magnetic flux is created by electron's electrostatic field, or by any electrostatic field for that matter. Due to its static nature it should be moving/varying to induce electric current. Otherwise there will be equilibrium between electrostatic fields leading to motionless state. (note that positive and negative magnetic poles is a superfluous concept if you accept that permanent magnets have perpetual free electron motion happening in them).

That's why I have a deep "belief" in magnetic monopoles: they are those "space-time" particles that may lead to pure overunity. Unfortunately, they are unstudied and are rejected by mainstream physics. My "DC acoustic waves" concept covers creation of these monopoles: it is based on particle collisions. The truth is I think that conventional physics has a serious problem with continuity of body movements. For example, when you strike a ball, that ball as a "pack" of elementary particles gains velocity. This also means that each particle gained energy proportionally. It is this energy level shift that bothers me. If you see a square wave on o-scope you see the voltage jumping up and down. From Fourier analysis, each jump is accompanied by a complex multi-frequency oscillation usually called "transient". This oscillation also naturally contains DC component - it's not fantasy, it's what Fourier shows. So, I'm pretty sure kinetic energy changes are also accompanied by this DC component, but in physical reality this DC component is represented by a short-living magneto-gravitic monopole particle. Without such particle no way kinetics can work: in Fourier space such kinetics will have a hard time to be represented: movements of all bodies will have to be purely sinusoidal in this case. While in reality we can stop body.

We - being smart asses - will be using these monopoles to gain (create) overunity energy, by using clever setups. The good thing is that we have a lot of evidences collected that are not supported by main-stream physics - that energy transients do generate some "strange" additional energy.