Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[duff]

@Duff,
I hope I am not wasting your time,but if I understand correctly you had the current going in the same direction as the magnetic field. The magnetic field should be at a 90 degree angle to the current. Think of a cathode ray tube in a TV. The conductors should be perpendicular to the glass plates with the flame touching both conductors. But, like I said, I have not personally done this so I may be wrong about it working.

@xee

I'm not sure which magnetic field you are referring to.

In the initial experiment, the south pole of the magnet was facing magnetic north which produced an arc on the top side of the carbon/tungsten rod.

In the flame test I did not use magnets but the plates were oriented east/west, so the earths magnetic field was 90 degrees to the current, if current was flowing across the glass.

I did not perform the test as you have stated. If I understand you correctly, the magnets would be on the outside of the glass  with the copper plates perpendicular to the glass plates and touching the flame.

I posted the experiment because I thought it might be important related to beta capture. That theory seems have fallen by the way...

Perhaps your seeing something more here, if so, please explain.

-Duff

[tagor]

I have experienced a second meltdown today. This leads me to believe that the first one wasn't an accident or connections error. However,  the reaction only takes place randomly and rarely. When it does, the results are devastating. The output heat and electricity are excessive. I am beginning to suspect we may not be able to control easily this reaction for continuous operation.

so the JL Naudin setup is not a continuous operation
it is one shot only !!
it is more easy to control all the parameters and reproduce the effet !!


If it is difficult to reproduce the effect ,
but you do not descrive very well your setup , how can we reproduce something !!!


with all the possibility of a big university in france , R L Vallee could not reproduce the d'Hoker setup !!
and you think to do it ?

you have to analyse all the parameters one by one
if you want to control something !!

[tagor]

I have been doing some experiments based on R L Vallee's setup and actually started getting good results, ie positive results. The solution is actually quite simple, it's based on an EMP, that is Electromagnetic Pulse. .

if you speak of the JL Naudin VSG setup there is a radioactive element
if you speak of the d'Hoker setup there is no radioactive element

this is a big difference !!

you need to descrive very well your setup
If not , I can beat that you would never get results

see all the experiments on Franck Vallee's forum...

[AbbaRue]

@Allcanadian:
I think you made two very good points for us all to keep in mind.
A quick pulse of energy, and a small rod of carbon.
I think the reason some have had poor results is because there carbon rods were to thick.
I think 6mm at the most in thickness, of coarse it needs to be thick enough so it won't just vaporize.
A AAA carbon rod "A"  Sounds like an all canadian choice Just the right thickness

I'm still waiting for the schematic for a variable pulse generator circuit,
I want to try different pulse length to see if that makes a difference.

[xee]

@Duff,
Yes, the magnets would be on the outside of the glass with a North to South orientation between them and the conductors would be on the inside with the current 90 degrees to the North-South poles of the magnets. The Earth magnetic field would not be strong enough to bend the current. I do not think this has any application to this thread, I was just trying to help you in case you wanted to try this. The ion current through the flame is like the beam of electrons in a cathode ray tube in a TV and the electrons in the cathode ray tube can be moved by holding a strong magnet next to the tube so I would expect the ions in the flame to be moved also.