Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

UncleFester

Quote from: k4zep on June 05, 2008, 02:14:55 PM
Hi Uncle Fester,

Several folk have been watching this thread and there is serious testing going on off this list.  No sense talking about it unless absolutely positive results.  I personally would not mind a hand drawn schematic from you, saves time and effort and gets the point across very fast.  My friends and I have all the equipment to build/test this device. 

From what I see so far, the engineering mountains to overcome are pulse current into and then current out of the device.  I so far have EMR pulse problems that really mucks with solid state instruments.  Shorts in the Toroid due to flash over when rod fires, HV supply Caps. that break down in a rapid fire pulse mode. High voltage/current IGBT's that roll over and die on command.   It's not as easy as it would first appear to be. 

Can you use a high current bidirectional sine wave through the rod/reactor or do you find that there is a need for a rapid rise time mono polarity pulse in the rod for maximum output? 


Respectfully
Ben K4ZEP

I've been trying to keep myself alive while working on a new electronics setup. Mexican truckers outbid us on are already low price to haul water for the drilling rigs at the local power plant. I have been having to scramble to make some money to keep my head above water.

In the meantime I have followed Juan's electronic layout to the last detail and have a microprocessor controlled system that automates switching of incoming mains supply off while the capacitor bank is discharged through 500V @ 200 Ampere Mosfets (2 in parallel). Alignment field is variable and processor controlled via PWM using AD inputs to check pulse voltage level on the alignment field windings of the toroid. I am making new bus bars for the capacitor bank because I was finding that resistance was too high between the mosfets and the  carbon rod (on the anode side) and I was not getting a good peak energy discharge. Tests will resume once this has been done.

Only problem I have seen so far is the back feeding of pulse energy through the mains line and thus it is required that the mains be isolated during capacitor discharge OR a large inductor placed on mains to protect it during discharge. Carbon rod temps will be an issue to tackle later. I don't have a schematic nor would many here be able to build the electronics I am using. Best to hang tight until more testing is done.

The process however can be built fifteen different ways and work the same. The requirements are 5th grade simple:

1. 1 Khz pulse across a pair of windings on the toroid for both bias and alignment field (peak to peak should be 100V or so).
2. SCR, Mosfet, IGBT etc can be used for dumping said required 110 joule charge across carbon.
3. Heavy gauge cable across discharge path, minimize resistance.
4. Switch mains off or use inductor to protect mains during cap firing.
5. Heavy wattage resistor on second pair of windings on toroid to check for power output.
6. Get real fancy and add relay for power transfer from output windings to input for self runner (hopefully = )

Juan already laid all this out for us. We just need to read what he said and his emails from him sent to others. But just the description above will allow anyone to build it.

lumen

(1. 1 Khz pulse across a pair of windings on the toroid for both bias and alignment field (peak to peak should be 100V or so).)

Not to sure about this, I think power to the toroid would not produce a field in the same direction as the winding on the original design.

????


UncleFester

Quote from: lumen on June 17, 2008, 08:24:04 PM
(1. 1 Khz pulse across a pair of windings on the toroid for both bias and alignment field (peak to peak should be 100V or so).)

Not to sure about this, I think power to the toroid would not produce a field in the same direction as the winding on the original design.

????



Juan said this is how he does it, and shows in his schematic. Windings get hot and do nothing under a normal power supply at 12-24VDC @ 2A, already tested this.

eldarion

UncleFester,

Were you able to reproduce the runaway event without a spark gap?  I am not clear on this.

About how many windings were on the toroid?  If you still have the original setup that caused runaway, a picture is worth a thousand words here. ;)

I've been running many tests here with absolutely no indication of overunity--it would be helpful to work from a known working setup.

Thanks!
"The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value."
-- Thomas Paine

UncleFester

Quote from: eldarion on June 18, 2008, 04:23:17 PM
UncleFester,

Were you able to reproduce the runaway event without a spark gap?  I am not clear on this.

About how many windings were on the toroid?  If you still have the original setup that caused runaway, a picture is worth a thousand words here. ;)

I've been running many tests here with absolutely no indication of overunity--it would be helpful to work from a known working setup.

Thanks!

The HV setup has been dismantled for weeks. It was a simple, crude and "just for kicks" setup. I reproduced the effect three times before I took it apart. It was taken apart because it was absolutely of no use for anything except de-sulfation of batteries, thus it is of no interest to me. I am looking for results that show viable uses in powering my home. If I do not see that result based on 315 VAC input and 220VAC @ 60hz output then I will no longer pursue the device. The high voltage at a few milliamperes of current powering itself only shows the device achieving anomalous results.

On the other hand, I know that most people in forums like this either don't build to exact specs of something that has been claimed to work. Or they tend to think "oh, I could build this better than the original working device" and then when it doesn't work, they openly claim the device does not work even though they did not build to spec. For over 17 years I have seen this occur in the "free energy" arena. And so I realize that there could be very real results if building exactly according to the schematics and information given by the originator of this thread, and thus I am building almost exactly to the original schematic minus the SCR, which only serves to isolate the mains power.

The battery bank idea from previous posts was great, but in order to lower current levels to something workable (I.E. 150-320 VDC input) then it would take a very large bank of batteries in series AND it is not how the original device was set up. Secondly lower voltages will not give useful AC output in the 120-240VAC range. So there are many good ideas, etc, but none of them match the exact specs of the device which started this thread. I am trying to build that exact (or very close) to that device.